These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3156949)

  • 1. A test of the differences between anticipation and study-test methods of paired-associate learning.
    Izawa C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jan; 11(1):165-84. PubMed ID: 3156949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The identity model and factors controlling the superiority of the study-test method over the anticipation method.
    Izawa C
    J Gen Psychol; 1985 Jan; 112(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 3998714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-retrieval and articulatory retention.
    Winitz H; Bellerose B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):466-77. PubMed ID: 1186156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrieval account of the long-term modality effect.
    Glenberg AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jan; 10(1):16-31. PubMed ID: 6242733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaction of instructions with the recall strategy actually used in a paired-associates learning task.
    Straub HR; Granaas MM
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Dec; 71(3 Pt 1):987-93. PubMed ID: 1454953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
    Shaw RJ; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When encoding fails: instructions, feedback, and registration without learning.
    Hintzman DL; Curran T
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 7731366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory self-ratings and objective test performance in a normal elderly sample.
    Larrabee GJ; Levin HS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1986 Jun; 8(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 3722352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arousal and paired-associate learning. Evidence refuting the action decrement theory of Walker and Tarte (1963).
    Schürer-Necker E
    Pavlov J Biol Sci; 1990; 25(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 2075029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of spaced vs. massed training in long-term object-identity and object-location recognition memory.
    Bello-Medina PC; Sánchez-Carrasco L; González-Ornelas NR; Jeffery KJ; Ramírez-Amaya V
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 250():102-13. PubMed ID: 23644160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential effects of alprazolam and buspirone upon acquisition, retention, and retrieval processes in memory.
    Barbee JG; Black FW; Todorov AA
    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1992; 4(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 1498583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Retrieval Practice on Short-Term and Long-Term Retention in HIV+ Individuals.
    Avci G; Woods SP; Verduzco M; Sheppard DP; Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti ND; DeLuca J;
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2017 Mar; 23(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 28067192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
    Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distinct episodic contexts enhance retrieval-based learning.
    Schwoebel J; Depperman AK; Scott JL
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1291-1296. PubMed ID: 29649927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glucose, relational memory, and the hippocampus.
    Stollery B; Christian L
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Jun; 232(12):2113-25. PubMed ID: 25527036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forgotten but not gone: savings for pictures and words in long-term memory.
    MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Apr; 14(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 2967343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17576148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval.
    Balota DA; Duchek JM; Paullin R
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Mar; 4(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 2803609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anticipation vs recall in the paired-associate learning of intellectually average and retarded subjects.
    Blue CM
    Psychol Rep; 1970 Aug; 27(1):327-34. PubMed ID: 5454118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.