158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31569496)
1. Whipple Grossing in the Era of New Staging: Should We Standardize?
Shi J; Basturk O
Diagnostics (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 31569496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dilemmas for the pathologist in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens : An overview of different grossing approaches and the relevance of the histopathological characteristics in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.
Soer E; Brosens L; van de Vijver M; Dijk F; van Velthuysen ML; Farina-Sarasqueta A; Morreau H; Offerhaus J; Koens L; Verheij J
Virchows Arch; 2018 Apr; 472(4):533-543. PubMed ID: 29589102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer.
Verbeke CS; Gladhaug IP
Br J Surg; 2012 Aug; 99(8):1036-49. PubMed ID: 22517199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.
Sierzega M; Bobrzyński Ł; Matyja A; Kulig J
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):248. PubMed ID: 27644962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathologic findings of Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: a 5-year review on 51 cases at Taleghani general hospital.
Foroughi F; Mohsenifar Z; Ahmadvand A; Zare K
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench; 2012; 5(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 24834223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved lymph node retrieval in Whipple specimens as a result of implementation of a new uncinate margin protocol.
Rowsell CH; Hanna S; Hsieh E; Law C; Khalifa MA
HPB (Oxford); 2007; 9(5):388-91. PubMed ID: 18345324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting the margin in pancreaticoduodenectomies: R0 versus R1.
Tampi CS; Nilkanth S; Jagannath P
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 28417289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathologic staging of pancreatic, ampullary, biliary, and gallbladder cancers: pitfalls and practical limitations of the current AJCC/UICC TNM staging system and opportunities for improvement.
Adsay NV; Bagci P; Tajiri T; Oliva I; Ohike N; Balci S; Gonzalez RS; Basturk O; Jang KT; Roa JC
Semin Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 29(3):127-41. PubMed ID: 23062420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171 consecutively treated patients.
Beger HG; Treitschke F; Gansauge F; Harada N; Hiki N; Mattfeldt T
Arch Surg; 1999 May; 134(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 10323425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems.
Yang M; Zhang Y; Zeng L; Ke NW; Tan CL; Tian BL; Xiang B; Liu XB
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 30661921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Is it an adequate cancer operation.
Tsao JI; Rossi RL; Lowell JA
Arch Surg; 1994 Apr; 129(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 7908796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Allen PJ; Kuk D; Castillo CF; Basturk O; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Lillemoe KD; Ferrone CR; Morales-Oyarvide V; He J; Weiss MJ; Hruban RH; Gönen M; Klimstra DS; Mino-Kenudson M
Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 27163957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current staging systems for pancreatic cancer.
Appel BL; Tolat P; Evans DB; Tsai S
Cancer J; 2012; 18(6):539-49. PubMed ID: 23187840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resectable adenocarcinomas in the pancreatic head: the retroperitoneal resection margin is an independent prognostic factor.
Westgaard A; Tafjord S; Farstad IN; Cvancarova M; Eide TJ; Mathisen O; Clausen OP; Gladhaug IP
BMC Cancer; 2008 Jan; 8():5. PubMed ID: 18194510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens.
Lof S; Rajak R; Vissers FLIM; Korrel M; Bateman A; Verheij J; Verbeke C; Cataldo I; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M
J Vis Exp; 2020 Feb; (156):. PubMed ID: 32065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of pathology sampling protocols for pancreatoduodenectomy specimens.
Grillo F; Ferro J; Vanoli A; Delfanti S; Pitto F; Peñuela L; Bianchi R; Grami O; Fiocca R; Mastracci L
Virchows Arch; 2020 May; 476(5):735-744. PubMed ID: 31802231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical margins for duodenopancreatectomy.
Coppola R; Cartillone M; Borzomati D; Nappo G; Valeri S; Petitti T; Perrone G
Updates Surg; 2016 Sep; 68(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 27778242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of intraoperative pathology consultations of whipple resection specimens and their impact on final margin status.
Sina N; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Chen L; Karanicolas P; Sun L; Roopchand P; Rowsell C; Truong T
Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e20238. PubMed ID: 37810002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic predictability of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for distal bile duct cancer: limited usefulness compared with the 7th staging system.
Kang JS; Lee S; Son D; Han Y; Lee KB; Kim JR; Kwon W; Kim SW; Jang JY
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Feb; 25(2):124-130. PubMed ID: 29239127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
