These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3156957)

  • 1. Multiple resources in divided attention: a cross-modal test of the independence of hemispheric resources.
    Herdman CM; Friedman A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Feb; 11(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 3156957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing.
    Friedman A; Polson MC; Dafoe CG; Gaskill SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):625-50. PubMed ID: 6218226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated sounds.
    Ciaramitaro VM; Chow HM; Eglington LG
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):20. PubMed ID: 28355632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Existence of competing modality dominances.
    Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing.
    Schmid C; Büchel C; Rose M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 21112404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetry in the auditory facilitation effect in dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation tasks.
    Takeshima Y; Gyoba J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104131. PubMed ID: 25119997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric specialization and attention: effects of complete and partial callosal section and hemispherectomy on dichotic monitoring.
    Wale J; Geffen G
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(4):483-96. PubMed ID: 3774134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term memory for simultaneously presented visual and auditory signals in the pigeon.
    Kraemer PJ; Roberts WA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 4009119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention-shift vs. response-priming explanations for the spatial cueing effect in cross-modal tasks.
    Paavilainen P; Illi J; Moisseinen N; Niinisalo M; Ojala K; Reinikainen J; Vainio L
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Jun; 57(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 26926651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters.
    Aiello M; Merola S; Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():75-85. PubMed ID: 29233717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cerebral asymmetries in inspection time?
    Sadler AJ; Deary IJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 Apr; 34(4):283-95. PubMed ID: 8657359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching.
    Escera C; Yago E; Corral MJ; Corbera S; Nuñez MI
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(8):2408-12. PubMed ID: 14622204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative BOLD in sensory cortices during verbal memory: a component in generating internal representations?
    Azulay H; Striem E; Amedi A
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):221-31. PubMed ID: 19326203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.