These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31570139)

  • 61. Confounding adjustment and exposure prediction in environmental epidemiology: additional insights.
    Dominici F; Cefalu M
    Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):e28. PubMed ID: 25643119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Theorems, proofs, examples, and rules in the practice of epidemiology.
    Vanderweele TJ; Ogburnb EL
    Epidemiology; 2012 May; 23(3):443-5. PubMed ID: 22475829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A bootstrap approach to evaluating person and item fit to the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23442324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
    Richiardi L; Bellocco R; Zugna D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1511-9. PubMed ID: 24019424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Evaluation of research studies. Part III: Statistical significance testing.
    Albers LL; Murphy PA
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 8423494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A test of missing completely at random for longitudinal data with missing observations.
    Park T; Lee SY
    Stat Med; 1997 Aug; 16(16):1859-71. PubMed ID: 9280038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. When and how to use instrumental variables in palliative care research.
    Penrod JD; Goldstein NE; Deb P
    J Palliat Med; 2009 May; 12(5):471-4. PubMed ID: 19416044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The sirens' songs of confirmatory sepsis trials: selection bias and sampling error.
    Natanson C; Esposito CJ; Banks SM
    Crit Care Med; 1998 Dec; 26(12):1927-31. PubMed ID: 9875887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Can DAGs clarify effect modification?
    Weinberg CR
    Epidemiology; 2007 Sep; 18(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 17700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comments on 'Choosing an optimal method to combine p-values' by Sungho Won, Nathan Morris, Qing Lu and Robert C. Elston, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28:1537-1553.
    Chen Z; Nadarajah S
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2959-61; author reply 2962-4. PubMed ID: 21969252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Estimating the Risk of a Rare But Plausible Complication That Has Not Occurred After n Trials.
    Ho AM; Ho AK; Mizubuti GB; Dion PW
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Nov; 127(5):1259-1263. PubMed ID: 29878940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Defining, Quantifying, and Interpreting "Noncollapsibility" in Epidemiologic Studies of Measures of "Effect".
    Whitcomb BW; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 190(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 33305812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A competing risks approach to "biologic" interaction.
    Andersen PK; Skrondal A
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(2):300-14. PubMed ID: 25613424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. On latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for binary response.
    Huang X; Tebbs JM
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 18945265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. How should one analyse and interpret clinical trials in which patients don't take the treatments assigned to them?
    Furberg CD
    J R Soc Med; 2010 May; 103(5):202-4. PubMed ID: 20436029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Bias in Prospective Research and How to Avoid it.
    Stenson JF; Kepler CK
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Jul; 32(6):254-255. PubMed ID: 30614841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding.
    Fu EL; Groenwold RHH; Zoccali C; Jager KJ; van Diepen M; Dekker FW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 30215791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The disjunctive cause criterion by VanderWeele: An easy solution to a complex problem?
    Ikram MA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 34(3):223-224. PubMed ID: 30835016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A call for the reporting of effect sizes in research reports to enhance critical appraisal and evidence-based practice.
    Mays MZ; Melnyk BM
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 19744052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. G-computation demonstration in causal mediation analysis.
    Wang A; Arah OA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 26537707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.