These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31571048)

  • 1. Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.
    Rababa'h AM; Alzoubi KH; Ababneh M; Khabour OF
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):821-831. PubMed ID: 31571048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.
    McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P
    J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Exploration of the Protective Effects of Investigators' Ethical Awareness upon Subjects of Drug Clinical Trials in China.
    Zhang L; Huang XX; Chen HF
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 29230696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative.
    Porter KM; Danis M; Taylor HA; Cho MK; Wilfond BS;
    Am J Bioeth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29313771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.
    Tarboush NA; Alkayed Z; Alzoubi KH; Al-Delaimy WK
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32316962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical considerations in planning and conducting research on human subjects.
    Sieber JE
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S9-13. PubMed ID: 8373498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigators' successful strategies for working with Institutional Review Boards.
    Cartwright JC; Hickman SE; Nelson CA; Knafl KA
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23813748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons.
    Kodish E; Stocking C; Ratain MJ; Kohrman A; Siegler M
    J Clin Oncol; 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6. PubMed ID: 1403062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.
    Macpherson CC
    Dev World Bioeth; 2001 May; 1(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 12870511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
    Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards.
    Mammel KA; Kaplan DW
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 Nov; 17(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 8924437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle.
    Chodos AH; Lee SJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():19. PubMed ID: 25889147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Can IRBs Learn From CABs? A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Recruitment and Training of Nonscientist Members on Research Review Boards.
    Solomon Cargill S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29226746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
    Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical and institutional review board issues.
    Skolnick BE
    Adv Neurol; 1998; 76():253-62. PubMed ID: 9408484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.
    Wolf LE; Croughan M; Lo B
    Med Care; 2002 Jun; 40(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 12021678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.