These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31571048)

  • 21. Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.
    Rivera SM; Goldenberg A; Rosenthal B; Aungst H; Maschke KJ; Rothwell E; Anderson RA; Botkin J; Joffe S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 26564943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: institutional review of research in work organizations.
    Ilgen DR; Bell BS
    Ethics Behav; 2001; 11(4):395-412. PubMed ID: 11838504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Knowledge, Awareness, Attitudes, and Practices towards Research Ethics and Research Ethics Committees among Myanmar Post-graduate Students.
    Than MM; Htike H; Silverman HJ
    Asian Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 12(4):379-398. PubMed ID: 33717341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ethical Issues and Practical Challenges in Suicide Research.
    Hom MA; Podlogar MC; Stanley IH; Joiner TE
    Crisis; 2017 Mar; 38(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 27561221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Returning Clinically Relevant Research Results to Participants: Guidelines for Investigators and the IRB.
    Waltz A; Johnson B; Schwartz PH
    Ethics Hum Res; 2024; 46(2):22-29. PubMed ID: 38446106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
    Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The investigator and the IRB: a survey of depression and schizophrenia researchers.
    Fischer BA; George P
    Schizophr Res; 2010 Sep; 122(1-3):206-12. PubMed ID: 20064703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implementation of Common Rule Changes to the Informed Consent Form: A Research Staff and Institutional Review Board Collaboration.
    Gartel G; Scuderi H; Servay C
    Ochsner J; 2020; 20(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 32284686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Working with the institutional review board.
    Byerly WG
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A qualitative study of Institutional Ethics Committees: Members' understanding of research guidelines, privacy, and challenges to privacy protection.
    Mishra NN; Bhatia T; Nimgaonkar VL; Deshpande SN; Parker LS
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 30121562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.
    Chenneville T; Menezes L; Bylsma LM; Mann A; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Oct; 9(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 25747296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about research ethics committees and informed consent among resident doctors.
    Al Demour S; Alzoubi KH; Alabsi A; Al Abdallat S; Alzayed A
    Int J Gen Med; 2019; 12():141-145. PubMed ID: 31114291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
    Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Research in nursing education and the institutional review board/ethics committee.
    Oermann MH; Barton A; Yoder-Wise PS; Morton PG
    J Prof Nurs; 2021; 37(2):342-347. PubMed ID: 33867088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exception From Informed Consent: How IRB Reviewers Assess Community Consultation and Public Disclosure.
    Chisolm-Straker M; Nassisi D; Daya MR; Cook JNB; Wilets IF; Clesca C; Richardson LD
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 32990501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inconsistencies in institutional review board decisions: A proposal to regulate the decision-making process.
    Ekmekci PE; Guner MD
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2019; 120(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 30793611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.