These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31571048)

  • 41. IRB Problems and Solutions in Health Communication Research.
    King CST; Bivens KM; Pumroy E; Rauch S; Koerber A
    Health Commun; 2018 Jul; 33(7):907-916. PubMed ID: 28586270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An Approach to Reviewing Local Context for Exception from Informed Consent Trials Using a Single IRB.
    Johnson AR; Rigtrup LM; VanBuren J; Rothwell E; Dean JM
    Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Nov; 43(6):42-48. PubMed ID: 34751515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Institutional review board practices regarding assent in pediatric research.
    Whittle A; Shah S; Wilfond B; Gensler G; Wendler D
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jun; 113(6):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15173501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A 12-year audit of IRB decisions.
    Grodin MA; Zaharoff BE; Kaminow PV
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1986 Mar; 12(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 3085041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Steps toward a System of IRB Precedent: Piloting Approaches to Summarizing IRB Decisions for Future Use.
    Seykora A; Coleman C; Rosenfeld SJ; Bierer BE; Lynch HF
    Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Nov; 43(6):2-18. PubMed ID: 34676693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.
    Pullman D
    J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):523-45. PubMed ID: 12461709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Institutional review board guidance on pediatric research: missed opportunities.
    Wolf LE; Zandecki J; Lo B
    J Pediatr; 2005 Jul; 147(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 16027701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience.
    Mosesso VN; Brown LH; Greene HL; Schmidt TA; Aufderheide TP; Sayre MR; Stephens SW; Travers A; Craven RA; Weisfeldt ML;
    Resuscitation; 2004 Apr; 61(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 15081178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Looking into the institutional review board: observations from both sides of the table.
    Burke GS
    J Nutr; 2005 Apr; 135(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 15795462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
    Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH
    IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees.
    Fritschi L; Kelsall HL; Loff B; Slegers C; Zion D; Glass DC
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 41(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 25605609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Contribution of Ethics Review to Protection of Human Participants: Comment on "Measuring the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards".
    Grady C
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Jul; 14(3):197-199. PubMed ID: 30896324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Basic principles for conducting human research in orthopaedic medicine.
    Slover JD; Shue J; Karia RJ; Band PA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2013 Jun; 21(6):364-71. PubMed ID: 23728961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards.
    Rothstein WG; Phuong LH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17393970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.
    Abernethy AP; Capell WH; Aziz NM; Ritchie C; Prince-Paul M; Bennett RE; Kutner JS
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Dec; 48(6):1211-21. PubMed ID: 24879998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Costs and inconsistencies in US IRB review of low-risk medical education research.
    Kano M; Getrich CM; Romney C; Sussman AL; Williams RL
    Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 49(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 25989411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan.
    Ayoub NM; Qandil AM; McCutchan JA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):372-382. PubMed ID: 31169072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limpattaracharoen C; Suebtrakul S; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Wilairatana P; Adams P; Kaewkungwal J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28807022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of local institutional review board review on participation in national practice-based research network studies.
    Finch SA; Barkin SL; Wasserman RC; Dhepyasuwan N; Slora EJ; Sege RD
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Dec; 163(12):1130-4. PubMed ID: 19996050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.