290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31571069)
1. The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.
Ortiz G; Drucker D; Hyde C; Staffetti J; Kremers J; Tzekov R
Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31571069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes.
Hara Y; Machida S; Ebihara S; Ishizuka M; Tada A; Nishimura T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 64(2):114-126. PubMed ID: 31900870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.
Joshi NR; Ly E; Viswanathan S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28508299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram.
Frishman L; Sustar M; Kremers J; McAnany JJ; Sarossy M; Tzekov R; Viswanathan S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 29855761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional Loss of the Inner Retina in Childhood Optic Gliomas Detected by Photopic Negative Response.
Abed E; Piccardi M; Rizzo D; Chiaretti A; Ambrosio L; Petroni S; Parrilla R; Dickmann A; Riccardi R; Falsini B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2469-74. PubMed ID: 25634980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.
Berezovsky A; Karanjia R; Fernandes AG; Botelho GIS; Bueno TLN; Ferraz NN; Sacai PY; Coupland SG; Sadun AA; Salomão SR
Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):153-163. PubMed ID: 32681419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of photopic negative response measurements in the time and time-frequency domains.
Kundra H; Park JC; McAnany JJ
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 27562839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early light deprivation effects on human cone-driven retinal function.
Esposito Veneruso P; Ziccardi L; Magli G; Parisi V; Falsini B; Magli A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 95(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 27535202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significant correlations between photopic negative response, afferent pupillary defect, and mean defects of visual fields in asymmetric optic nerve disorders.
Okuno T; Kida T; Ikeda T; Oku H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 258(8):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 32080769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Full-field electroretinogram in autism spectrum disorder.
Constable PA; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM; Jägle H; Thompson DA
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 132(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 26868825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Variations in Human Retinal Electrical Responses Quantified in a Twin Study.
Bhatti T; Tariq A; Shen T; Williams KM; Hammond CJ; Mahroo OA
Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug; 124(8):1175-1185. PubMed ID: 28434717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter-ocular and inter-session reliability of the electroretinogram photopic negative response (PhNR) in non-human primates.
Fortune B; Bui BV; Cull G; Wang L; Cioffi GA
Exp Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 78(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 14667830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rapid N-wave as a potentially useful measure of the photopic negative response.
Pham BH; Goldberg JL; Marmor MF
Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 141(3):253-257. PubMed ID: 32507902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.
Wang J; Cheng H; Hu YS; Tang RA; Frishman LJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23. PubMed ID: 22273726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Full-field electroretinogram recorded with skin electrodes in 6- to 12-year-old children.
Wang J; Wang Y; Guan W; Zhao YE
Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 147(3):179-188. PubMed ID: 37530953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion.
Chen H; Wu D; Huang S; Yan H
Doc Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 113(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
