These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1022 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31571091)

  • 1. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.
    Zhou J; Gu W; Li S; Wu L; Gao Y; Guo X
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia.
    Zhou J; Gao Y; Li S; Gu W; Wu L; Guo X
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 31878825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.
    Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
    Lim SA; Park Y; Cheong YJ; Na KS; Joo CK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia.
    Liu M; Shi W; Liu X; Li N; Chen T; Gao H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(8):1709-1717. PubMed ID: 33891212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.
    Shen Y; Chen Z; Knorz MC; Li M; Zhao J; Zhou X
    J Refract Surg; 2014 May; 30(5):310-8. PubMed ID: 24904933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.
    Kuryan J; Cheema A; Chuck RS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD011080. PubMed ID: 28197998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes following surface ablation techniques in a large population for myopia correction.
    Kulkarni SV; AlMahmoud T; Priest D; Taylor SE; Mintsioulis G; Jackson WB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):609-19. PubMed ID: 23221080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis to correct myopic astigmatism.
    Gros-Otero J; Garcia-Gonzalez M; Teus MA; Iglesias-Iglesias M; Gimenez-Vallejo C
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 27751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective bilateral comparison of epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia.
    Hondur A; Bilgihan K; Hasanreisoglu B
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 24(9):928-34. PubMed ID: 19044234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
    Rocha KM; Krueger RR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):293-301.e1. PubMed ID: 24792107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.
    Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba Mosquera S
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 27(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 20438023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Han T; Xu Y; Han X; Zeng L; Shang J; Chen X; Zhou X
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):565-568. PubMed ID: 30061116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F; Al-Rajhi A; Wagoner MD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Cagil N; Aydin B; Ozturk S; Hasiripi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 17397737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
    Wu F; Yin H; Yang Y
    Curr Eye Res; 2021 Aug; 46(8):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 33494622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.