These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1024 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31571091)

  • 21. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.
    Hamilton DR; Johnson RD; Lee N; Bourla N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19027558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy versus epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
    Wen D; Huang J; Li X; Savini G; Feng Y; Lin Q; Wang Q
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 24024483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia more than -10.00 diopters].
    Huang P; Liu J; Xia YJ; Zhong YY; Chen YG
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Oct; 39(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 17940568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.
    Kahuam-López N; Navas A; Castillo-Salgado C; Graue-Hernandez EO; Jimenez-Corona A; Ibarra A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012946. PubMed ID: 32255519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Central ablation depth and postoperative refraction in excimer laser myopic correction measured with ultrasound, Scheimpflug, and optical coherence pachymetry.
    Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Arba Mosquera S
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 25(8):699-708. PubMed ID: 19714794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.
    Schallhorn JM; Schallhorn SC; Ou Y
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 25444636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Posterior corneal surface stability after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Low A; Kadir AJ; Chow ZY; Khang TF; Singh S
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 72(8):1118-1123. PubMed ID: 39078954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Vestergaard A; Ivarsen A; Asp S; Hjortdal JØ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 22512839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Epi-LASIK versus epi-LASEK.
    Camellin M; Wyler D
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 24(1):S57-63. PubMed ID: 18269152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system.
    Tomita M; Watabe M; Yukawa S; Nakamura N; Nakamura T; Magnago T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 24345530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Eldaly ZH; Abdelsalam MA; Hussein MS; Nassr MA
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):113-121. PubMed ID: 30977320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
    Reinstein DZ; Gobbe M; Gobbe L; Archer TJ; Carp GI
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 26352563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia.
    Li M; Li M; Chen Y; Miao H; Yang D; Ni K; Zhou X
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 97(3):e373-e380. PubMed ID: 30632671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
    Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Guo H; Hosseini-Moghaddam SM; Hodge W
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):167. PubMed ID: 31370817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser.
    Kim CY; Song JH; Na KS; Chung SH; Joo CK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21350688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Six modes of corneal topography for evaluation of ablation zones after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
    Li H; Peng Y; Chen M; Tian L; Li D; Zhang F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 258(7):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 32328759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longitudinal comparison of outcomes after sub-Bowman keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis: randomized, double-masked study.
    Wong RC; Yu M; Chan TC; Chong KK; Jhanji V
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 159(5):835-45.e3. PubMed ID: 25681001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.