These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31572253)

  • 1. Implicit Processing of Pitch in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tillmann B; Poulin-Charronnat B; Gaudrain E; Akhoun I; Delbé C; Truy E; Collet L
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1990. PubMed ID: 31572253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit investigations of tonal knowledge in nonmusician listeners.
    Tillmann B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():100-10. PubMed ID: 16597757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Neurophysiological Study of Musical Pitch Identification in Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users.
    Cai J; Liu Y; Yao M; Xu M; Zhang H
    Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():4576729. PubMed ID: 32774355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early Deafened, Late Implanted Cochlear Implant Users Appreciate Music More Than and Identify Music as Well as Postlingual Users.
    Fuller C; Başkent D; Free R
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1050. PubMed ID: 31680802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Priming paradigm reveals harmonic structure processing in congenital amusia.
    Tillmann B; Gosselin N; Bigand E; Peretz I
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):1073-8. PubMed ID: 22326325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harmony Perception in Prelingually Deaf, Juvenile Cochlear Implant Users.
    Zimmer V; Verhey JL; Ziese M; Böckmann-Barthel M
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():466. PubMed ID: 31139046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The tonal function of a task-irrelevant chord modulates speed of visual processing.
    Escoffier N; Tillmann B
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1070-83. PubMed ID: 18076873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Are Able to Discriminate Basic Tonal Features in Musical Patterns: Evidence From Event-related Potentials.
    Hahne A; Mainka A; Leuner A; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e360-8. PubMed ID: 27631660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.
    Stupak N; Todd AE; Landsberger DM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):301-312. PubMed ID: 33606415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implant users rely on tempo rather than on pitch information during perception of musical emotion.
    Caldwell M; Rankin SK; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S114-20. PubMed ID: 26561882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of Musical Tension in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Spangmose S; Hjortkjær J; Marozeau J
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():987. PubMed ID: 31680795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.