These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31572266)
1. Training Participants to Focus on Critical Facial Features Does Not Decrease Own-Group Bias. Wittwer T; Tredoux CG; Py J; Paubel PV Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2081. PubMed ID: 31572266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces. Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived Race Affects Configural Processing but Not Holistic Processing in the Composite-Face Task. Lewis MB; Hills PJ Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1456. PubMed ID: 30177898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face. Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Not all faces are processed equally: evidence for featural rather than holistic processing of one's own face in a face-imaging task. Greenberg SN; Goshen-Gottstein Y J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 19271862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance. Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2027-40. PubMed ID: 20362599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention. Hills PJ; Lewis MB Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):996-1002. PubMed ID: 16885139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles. Wang Z; Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Yu X; Sun YH; Liu J; Pascalis O; Ge L; Lee K Front Psychol; 2015; 6():559. PubMed ID: 26005427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces. Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlations between holistic processing, Autism quotient, extraversion, and experience and the own-gender bias in face recognition. Morgan M; Hills PJ PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0209530. PubMed ID: 31276470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tolerance to spatial-relational transformations in unfamiliar faces: A further challenge to a configural processing account of identity recognition. Lorenzino M; Caminati M; Caudek C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():25-38. PubMed ID: 29807303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-Face Recognition in Schizophrenia: An Eye-Tracking Study. Bortolon C; Capdevielle D; Salesse RN; Raffard S Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():3. PubMed ID: 26903833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia. Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study. Stahl J; Wiese H; Schweinberger SR Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 18388743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual scanning behavior is related to recognition performance for own- and other-age faces. Proietti V; Macchi Cassia V; dell'Amore F; Conte S; Bricolo E Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1684. PubMed ID: 26579056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]