235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31574825)
21. Miss rate of colorectal cancer at CT colonography in average-risk symptomatic patients.
Simons PC; Van Steenbergen LN; De Witte MT; Janssen-Heijnen ML
Eur Radiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):908-13. PubMed ID: 23085864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic value of circulating miR-21 for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Shan L; Ji Q; Cheng G; Xia J; Liu D; Wu C; Zhu B; Ding Y
Cancer Biomark; 2015; 15(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 25524942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevalence and risk factors for post-investigation colorectal cancer ("interval cancer") after computed tomographic colonography: protocol for a systematic review.
Plumb AA; Obaro A; Fanshawe T; Torres US; Baldwin-Cleland R; Halligan S; Burling D
Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):36. PubMed ID: 28222812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Plumb AA; Halligan S; Pendsé DA; Taylor SA; Mallett S
Eur Radiol; 2014 May; 24(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 24519111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Local Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 26 Individual Studies.
Yu T; Meng N; Chi D; Zhao Y; Wang K; Luo Y
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2015 Jun; 72(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 25737131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retrospective analysis of computed tomographic colonography in a rural hospital.
Lee BJ; Balasingam A; Van den Bosch R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Aug; 61(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 28105788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
Graser A; Melzer A; Lindner E; Nagel D; Herrmann K; Stieber P; Schirra J; Mansmann U; Reiser MF; Göke B; Kolligs FT
Gastroenterology; 2013 Apr; 144(4):743-750.e2. PubMed ID: 23415805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Lin JS; Piper MA; Perdue LA; Rutter CM; Webber EM; O'Connor E; Smith N; Whitlock EP
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2576-94. PubMed ID: 27305422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What is the value of computered tomography colonography in patients screening positive for fecal occult blood? A systematic review and economic evaluation.
Walleser S; Griffiths A; Lord SJ; Howard K; Solomon MJ; Gebski V
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Dec; 5(12):1439-46; quiz 1368. PubMed ID: 18054752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer.
Regge D; Laudi C; Galatola G; Della Monica P; Bonelli L; Angelelli G; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Bartolozzi C; Bielen D; Boni L; Borghi C; Bruzzi P; Cassinis MC; Galia M; Gallo TM; Grasso A; Hassan C; Laghi A; Martina MC; Neri E; Senore C; Simonetti G; Venturini S; Gandini G
JAMA; 2009 Jun; 301(23):2453-61. PubMed ID: 19531785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Usefulness of imaging studies for diagnosing and localizing cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim DH; Kim SW; Kim SH; Jung JH; Hwang SH
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2022 Jun; 12(6):828-837. PubMed ID: 34889068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic Value and Clinical Significance of Methylated SEPT9 for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Hu J; Hu B; Gui YC; Tan ZB; Xu JW
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5813-5822. PubMed ID: 31378778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging an Accurate Diagnostic Method for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Yinzhong W; Xiaoxue T; Jinhui T; Pengcheng Y; Xiaoying L; Junqiang L
Curr Med Imaging; 2022; 18(6):633-647. PubMed ID: 34533447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of Combined Computed Tomography Colonography and Dual Energy Iiodine Map Imaging for Detecting Colorectal masses using High-pitch Dual-source CT.
Sun K; Han R; Han Y; Shi X; Hu J; Lu B
Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3790. PubMed ID: 29491380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Insurance Coverage for CT Colonography Screening: Impact on Overall Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates.
Smith MA; Weiss JM; Potvien A; Schumacher JR; Gangnon RE; Kim DH; Weeth-Feinstein LA; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):717-724. PubMed ID: 28696184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.
Halligan S; Wooldrage K; Dadswell E; Kralj-Hans I; von Wagner C; Edwards R; Yao G; Kay C; Burling D; Faiz O; Teare J; Lilford RJ; Morton D; Wardle J; Atkin W;
Lancet; 2013 Apr; 381(9873):1185-93. PubMed ID: 23414648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population.
Liedenbaum MH; de Vries AH; van Rijn AF; Dekker HM; Willemssen FE; van Leerdam ME; van Marrewijk CJ; Fockens P; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Stoker J
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Dec; 35(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 19888629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography for detecting ureteric obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen Z; Huang H; Yang J; Cai H; Yu Y
Ann Med; 2020 Sep; 52(6):275-282. PubMed ID: 32233669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
