These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31575108)

  • 1. Superior Facet Joint Violations in Single Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study.
    Patel JY; Kundnani VG; Merchant ZI; Jain S; Kire N
    Asian Spine J; 2020 Feb; 14(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31575108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Retrospective Analysis of Superior Facet Joint Violation Between Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and its Relation to Adjacent Segment Disease.
    Maharjan S; Zeng Z; Yu Y; Cheng L
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Jun; 34(5):E256-E263. PubMed ID: 38011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
    Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superior Facet Joint Violations during Single Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Clinical Study.
    Jia L; Yu Y; Khan K; Li F; Zhu R; Zeng Z; Cheng L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():6152769. PubMed ID: 29693011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk Factors Related to Superior Facet Joint Violation During Lumbar Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).
    Zhao Y; Yuan S; Tian Y; Liu X
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 139():e716-e723. PubMed ID: 32360675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of risk factors for adjacent superior vertebral pedicle-induced facet joint violation during the minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study.
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Xu W; Yu Y; Hu X; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Eur J Med Res; 2015 Sep; 20():80. PubMed ID: 26399320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and risk factors associated with superior-segmented facet joint violation during minimal invasive lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singhatanadgige W; Jaruprat P; Kerr SJ; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
    Spine J; 2022 Sep; 22(9):1504-1512. PubMed ID: 35447323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidences and Risk factors of Screw-related Superior Facet Articular Surface Violation at L4 and L5 levels in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Open Surgery Versus Minimally Invasive Techniques.
    Huang CP; Lin HH; Yao YC; Lu Y; Liu PC; Chang MC; Wang ST; Chou PH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Dec; 46(23):E1283-E1291. PubMed ID: 33907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical and technical factors associated with superior facet joint violation in lumbar fusion.
    Teles AR; Paci M; Gutman G; Abduljabbar FH; Ouellet JA; Weber MH; Golan JD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Feb; 28(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 29219780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
    Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of screw placement guided by O-arm navigation and ultrasound volume navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
    Lin X; Chang Q; Shang L; Shen S; Fu Z; Wang Y; Zhou L; Fu H; Zhao G
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 37(11):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 37987052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Radiographic Analyses and Clinical Outcomes Between O-Arm Navigated and Fluoroscopic-Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Singhatanadgige W; Pholprajug P; Songthong K; Yingsakmongkol W; Triganjananun C; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
    Int J Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 35177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes.
    Yang Y; Liu B; Rong LM; Chen RQ; Dong JW; Xie PG; Zhang LM; Feng F
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(11):21319-26. PubMed ID: 26885072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Three Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Techniques for Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Surgical Posterolateral Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Midline Lumbar Fusion.
    Elmekaty M; Kotani Y; Mehy EE; Robinson Y; Tantawy AE; Sekiguchi I; Fujita R
    Asian Spine J; 2018 Oct; 12(5):870-879. PubMed ID: 30213170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.