These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31575372)

  • 1. No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.
    Sharp NP; Whitlock MC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Oct; 286(1912):20191474. PubMed ID: 31575372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection and the nonrandom union of gametes: retesting for assortative mating by fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Talagala S; Rakosy E; Long TAF
    Evolution; 2024 Jan; 78(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 37875133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection and the random union of gametes: testing for a correlation in fitness between mates in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 19757995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When Do Opposites Attract? A Model Uncovering the Evolution of Disassortative Mating.
    Maisonneuve L; Beneteau T; Joron M; Smadi C; Llaurens V
    Am Nat; 2021 Nov; 198(5):625-641. PubMed ID: 34648401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.
    Galaverni M; Caniglia R; Milanesi P; Lapalombella S; Fabbri E; Randi E
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 26610365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.
    Mallet MA; Chippindale AK
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 106(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 21119701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polymorphisms in a desaturase 2 ortholog associate with cuticular hydrocarbon and male mating success variation in a natural population of Drosophila serrata.
    Ivory-Church J; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1600-9. PubMed ID: 26104145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of disassortative and assortative mating preferences based on imprinting.
    Ihara Y; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Sep; 64(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12948680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-dependent and correlational selection pressures have conflicting consequences for assortative mating in a color-polymorphic lizard, Uta stansburiana.
    Lancaster LT; McAdam AG; Hipsley CA; Sinervo BR
    Am Nat; 2014 Aug; 184(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 25058279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unifying quantification methods for sexual selection and assortative mating using information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2024 Aug; 158():206-215. PubMed ID: 38917935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assortative mating and gene flow generate clinal phenological variation in trees.
    Soularue JP; Kremer A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2012 Jun; 12():79. PubMed ID: 22681626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral genetics of Drosophila ananassae.
    Singh SR; Singh BN
    Genet Mol Res; 2003 Dec; 2(4):394-409. PubMed ID: 15011143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of population size and selection intensity on responses to disruptive selection in Drosophila melangaster.
    Barker JS; Karlsson LJ
    Genetics; 1974 Oct; 78(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 4217303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mating behavior as an indicator of quality of Drosophila subobscura males?
    Savic Veselinovic M; Pavkovic-Lucic S; Kurbalija Novicic Z; Jelic M; Stamenkovic-Radak M; Andjelkovic M
    Insect Sci; 2017 Feb; 24(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 26235310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.
    Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
    Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaaq0369. PubMed ID: 29806021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males.
    McGuigan K; Petfield D; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2011 Oct; 65(10):2816-29. PubMed ID: 21967424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.