BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31576421)

  • 1. The impact of when, what and how predictions on auditory speech perception.
    Pinto S; Tremblay P; Basirat A; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3143-3153. PubMed ID: 31576421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Kandel S; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 28676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The timing of visual speech modulates auditory neural processing.
    Sato M
    Brain Lang; 2022 Dec; 235():105196. PubMed ID: 36343508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual speech asynchrony asymmetrically modulates neural binding.
    Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Jun; 198():108866. PubMed ID: 38518889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competing influence of visual speech on auditory neural adaptation.
    Sato M
    Brain Lang; 2023 Dec; 247():105359. PubMed ID: 37951157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congruent Visual Speech Enhances Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Auditory Speech in Noise-Free Conditions.
    Crosse MJ; Butler JS; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(42):14195-204. PubMed ID: 26490860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain prediction of auditory emphasis by facial expressions during audiovisual continuous speech.
    Strelnikov K; Foxton J; Marx M; Barone P
    Brain Topogr; 2015 May; 28(3):494-505. PubMed ID: 24366693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence for Audio-visuo-lingual speech integration.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Schwartz JL; Hueber T; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():126-133. PubMed ID: 29248497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.
    van Wassenhove V; Grant KW; Poeppel D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Jan; 102(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 15647358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.
    Peelle JE; Sommers MS
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():169-81. PubMed ID: 25890390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) in audiovisual speech perception.
    Pilling M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 19641083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual prediction cues can facilitate behavioural and neural speech processing in young and older adults.
    Tremblay P; Basirat A; Pinto S; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Aug; 159():107949. PubMed ID: 34228997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left Motor δ Oscillations Reflect Asynchrony Detection in Multisensory Speech Perception.
    Biau E; Schultz BG; Gunter TC; Kotz SA
    J Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 42(11):2313-2326. PubMed ID: 35086905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
    Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.