These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31576442)

  • 1. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.
    Takeno S; Tanoue Y; Hamada R; Kawano F; Tashiro K; Wada T; Ikenoue M; Nanashima A; Nakamura K
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 31576442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Okamura A; Watanabe M; Mine S; Nishida K; Imamura Y; Kurogochi T; Kitagawa Y; Sano T
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4279-85. PubMed ID: 26743111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Tanishima Y; Nishikawa K; Ishikawa Y; Takahashi K; Masuda T; Kurogochi T; Yuda M; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Yano F; Mitsumori N; Ikegami T
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3947-3956. PubMed ID: 34494153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors of difficulty of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position.
    Fujiwara Y; Lee S; Gyobu K; Inazu D; Naka R; Nishiyama M; Ohira M; Osugi H
    Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 16(3):316-323. PubMed ID: 31041586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Tanaka E; Okabe H; Kinjo Y; Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Sakai Y
    Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 25387656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
    Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Markar SR; Wiggins T; Antonowicz S; Zacharakis E; Hanna GB
    Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 26096374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position.
    Seesing MFJ; Goense L; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 29209832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thoracic cavity-to-cage ratio is a predictor of technical difficulties in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Abe T; Oshikiri T; Goto H; Kato T; Horikawa M; Sawada R; Harada H; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Kakeji Y
    Surgery; 2022 Jul; 172(1):145-149. PubMed ID: 35314070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients.
    Puntambekar SP; Agarwal GA; Joshi SN; Rayate NV; Sathe RM; Patil AM
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2407-14. PubMed ID: 20204415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mediastinal Adiposity Influences the Technical Difficulty of Thoracic Procedure in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Okamura A; Watanabe M; Kurogochi T; Imamura Y; Nishida K; Mine S
    World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2398-404. PubMed ID: 27194559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Teshima J; Miyata G; Kamei T; Nakano T; Abe S; Katsura K; Taniyama Y; Sakurai T; Hikage M; Nakamura T; Takaya K; Zuguchi M; Okamoto H; Youhei O; Ohuchi N
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2756-62. PubMed ID: 25480621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Noshiro H; Iwasaki H; Kobayashi K; Uchiyama A; Miyasaka Y; Masatsugu T; Koike K; Miyazaki K
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2965-73. PubMed ID: 20495981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival outcomes of 220 consecutive patients with three-staged thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Noshiro H; Yoda Y; Hiraki M; Kono H; Miyake S; Uchiyama A; Nagai E
    Dis Esophagus; 2016 Nov; 29(8):1090-1099. PubMed ID: 26541471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Esophagus; 2018 Apr; 15(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29892934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions.
    Fabian T; Martin J; Katigbak M; McKelvey AA; Federico JA
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Nov; 22(11):2485-91. PubMed ID: 18320278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.