These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31577067)
1. In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents. Zarean P; Roozbeh R; Zarean P; Jahromi MZ; Broujeni PM Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 31577067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Motahari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22269237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer to Two Pulp Capping Materials. Doozaneh M; Koohpeima F; Firouzmandi M; Abbassiyan F Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(1):103-107. PubMed ID: 28179935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate. Cantekin K J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 25823484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine. Altunsoy M; Tanrıver M; Ok E; Kucukyilmaz E J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1691-5. PubMed ID: 26238526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). Cantekin K; Avci S J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 25141202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluations of shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture to bulk-fill flowable composite using three different adhesive systems: An Fatima A; İftekhar H; Alam S; Tewari RK; Andrabi MUN J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Jul; 27(7):706-713. PubMed ID: 39262590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement with ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus. Tyagi N; Chaman C; Anand S; Dhull A; Prakash R; Tomar H J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 38514429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to glass ionomers. Ergül R; Aksu S; Çalışkan S; Tüloğlu N BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):140. PubMed ID: 38281948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents. Ajami AA; Jafari Navimipour E; Savadi Oskoee S; Abed Kahnamoui M; Lotfi M; Daneshpooy M J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2013; 7(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 24082988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed with Water and Water-based Gel Regarding Shear Bond Strength with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite. Kaul R; Choudhary A; Kour S; Singh A; Kumari N; Manish K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 34267002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Tulumbaci F; Almaz ME; Arikan V; Mutluay MS J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 29386773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bond strength of composite resin to pulp capping biomaterials after application of three different bonding systems. Jaberi-Ansari Z; Mahdilou M; Ahmadyar M; Asgary S J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2013; 7(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 24082986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Alzraikat H; Taha NA; Qasrawi D; Burrow MF Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):881-887. PubMed ID: 27680033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials. Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shear bond strength of calcium enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin with two different adhesive systems. Savadi Oskoee S; Bahari M; Kimyai S; Motahhari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Nov; 11(6):665-71. PubMed ID: 25628696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo. Kaup M; Dammann CH; Schäfer E; Dammaschke T Head Face Med; 2015 Apr; 11():14. PubMed ID: 25908430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bond strength of a composite resin with two different adhesive systems and a resin modified glass ionomer to calcium enriched mixture. Elmi M; Ehsani M; Esmaeili B; Khafri S J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(4):369-372. PubMed ID: 30122815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of shear bond strength of light cure mineral trioxide aggregate and light cure calcium hydroxide with nanofilled composite: A stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscope analysis. Boby A; Pai D; Ginjupalli K; Gaur S J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32174630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]