These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Perception of multiple electrode stimulus patterns: implications for design of an electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Galvin KL; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):360-8. PubMed ID: 1825833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phonemic information transmitted by a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Clark GM J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):620-9. PubMed ID: 3230892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Alcántara JI; Blombery PA; Hopkins IJ; Whitford LA; Clark GM J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading. Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech feature recognition by profoundly hearing impaired children using a multiple-channel electrotactile speech processor and aided residual hearing. Alcántara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1260-73. PubMed ID: 2146295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Studies on hand-held visual communication device for the deaf and speech-impaired I. Visual display window size. Thurlow WR Ear Hear; 1980; 1(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6446474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor. Blamey PJ; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 2957405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of palantype and stenograph for use in a speech transcription aid for the deaf. Arnott JL; Newell AF; Downton AC J Biomed Eng; 1979 Jul; 1(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 161992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The sentiphone: a tactual speech communication aid. Traunmüller H J Commun Disord; 1980 May; 13(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 6445912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tactile aids for profoundly deaf children. Goldstein MH; Proctor A J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):258-65. PubMed ID: 3156167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The Mini-Fonator: a portable vibrotactile aid, a tool for aid in communication for the profoundly deaf, both children and adults]. Chabrol A; Guérin F; Rebufy M; Le Tousse A Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1986; 107(5):429-31. PubMed ID: 2951830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Acquisition of a 250-word vocabulary through a tactile vocoder. Brooks PL; Frost BJ; Mason JL; Chung K J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1576-9. PubMed ID: 3157716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two training strategies for speech recognition with an electrotactile speech processor. Alcantara JI; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Clark GM J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2138238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]