224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31577522)
1. Engaging the Articulators Enhances Perception of Concordant Visible Speech Movements.
Masapollo M; Guenther FH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3679-3688. PubMed ID: 31577522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human Sensorimotor Cortex Control of Directly Measured Vocal Tract Movements during Vowel Production.
Conant DF; Bouchard KE; Leonard MK; Chang EF
J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(12):2955-2966. PubMed ID: 29439164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Asymmetries in unimodal visual vowel perception: The roles of oral-facial kinematics, orientation, and configuration.
Masapollo M; Polka L; Ménard L; Franklin L; Tiede M; Morgan J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1103-1118. PubMed ID: 29517257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid change in articulatory lip movement induced by preceding auditory feedback during production of bilabial plosives.
Mochida T; Gomi H; Kashino M
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13866. PubMed ID: 21079783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inside Speech: Multisensory and Modality-specific Processing of Tongue and Lip Speech Actions.
Treille A; Vilain C; Hueber T; Lamalle L; Sato M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 29(3):448-466. PubMed ID: 28139959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase relations of jaw and tongue tip movements in the production of VCV utterances.
Nittrouer S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1806-15. PubMed ID: 1960276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production of bite-block vowels: acoustic equivalence by selective compensation.
Gay T; Lindblom B; Lubker J
J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):802-10. PubMed ID: 7240561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recalibration of auditory perception of speech due to orofacial somatosensory inputs during speech motor adaptation.
Ohashi H; Ito T
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Nov; 122(5):2076-2084. PubMed ID: 31509469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The timing of articulatory gestures: evidence for relational invariants.
Tuller B; Kelso JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Oct; 76(4):1030-6. PubMed ID: 6501697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual Context Enhanced: The Joint Contribution of Iconic Gestures and Visible Speech to Degraded Speech Comprehension.
Drijvers L; Özyürek A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27960196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of speaking rate on the upper lip, lower lip, and jaw peak velocity sequencing during bilabial closing movements.
DeNil LF; Abbs JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):845-9. PubMed ID: 2016434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tongues and lips without jaws: a comparison of methods for decoupling speech movements.
Westbury JR; Lindstrom MJ; McClean MD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Aug; 45(4):651-62. PubMed ID: 12199396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of varying lower-lip displacement on upper-lip movements: implications for the coordination of speech movements.
Folkins JW; Linville RN
J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 6887807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.
Patri JF; Ostry DJ; Diard J; Schwartz JL; Trudeau-Fisette P; Savariaux C; Perrier P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(11):6255-6263. PubMed ID: 32123070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vocal tract normalization for midsagittal articulatory recovery with analysis-by-synthesis.
McGowan RS; Cushing S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1090-105. PubMed ID: 10462814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A universal bias in adult vowel perception - By ear or by eye.
Masapollo M; Polka L; Ménard L
Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():358-370. PubMed ID: 28601721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Articulatory and acoustic correlates of contrastive focus in congenitally blind adults and sighted adults.
Ménard L; Leclerc A; Tiede M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 24687083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Movements of the upper and lower lips during speech: interactions between lips with the jaw fixed at different positions.
Folkins JW; Canty JL
J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 3762098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions.
Simpson AP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2153-64. PubMed ID: 11386567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability of lip and jaw movements in the speech of children and adults.
Smith BL
Phonetica; 1995; 52(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 7568398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
