169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31580087)
1. Contributions of semantic and contextual diversity to the word frequency effect in L2 lexical access.
Hamrick P; Pandža NB
Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31580087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do semantic sentence constraint and L2 proficiency influence language selectivity of lexical access in native language listening?
Lagrou E; Hartsuiker RJ; Duyck W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1524-38. PubMed ID: 26460870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing word frequency, semantic diversity, and semantic distinctiveness in lexical organization.
Chang M; Jones MN; Johns BT
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 37307352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-language associative priming is influenced by language proficiency and executive control.
Friesen DC; Haigh CA
Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Dec; 72(4):264-276. PubMed ID: 30307260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining the importance of frequency and contextual diversity in the lexical organization of multiword expressions.
Senaldi MSG; Titone DA; Johns BT
Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Jun; 76(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 35143239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The way in which foreign words are learned determines their use in isolation and within sentences.
García-Gámez AB; Macizo P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):364-379. PubMed ID: 31120267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proficiency and sentence constraint effects on second language word learning.
Ma T; Chen B; Lu C; Dunlap S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():116-22. PubMed ID: 26094128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception in a second language: Hearing is believing-seeing is not.
Ma F; Ai H; Xiao T; Guo T; Pae HK
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):881-890. PubMed ID: 32075498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Lexical Properties in L2 Chinese Compound Processing: A Multivariate Approach.
Liu Y; Xiao F
J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 May; 53(4):49. PubMed ID: 38782761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?
Ivanova I; Costa A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 17662226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective age of acquisition norms for 1604 English words by Spanish L2 speakers of English and their relationship with lexico-semantic, affective, sociolinguistic and proficiency variables.
Rodriguez-Cuadrado S; Hinojosa JA; Guasch M; Romero-Rivas C; Sabater L; Suárez-Coalla P; Ferré P
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4437-4454. PubMed ID: 36477592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phonological memory in bilinguals and monolinguals.
Yoo J; Kaushanskaya M
Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1314-30. PubMed ID: 22907206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Native Translation Frequency and L2 Proficiency on L2 word Recognition: Evidence from Korean Speakers of English as a Foreign Language.
Baek H; Tae J; Lee Y; Choi W
J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1325-1343. PubMed ID: 36315247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in word recognition between early bilinguals and monolinguals: behavioral and ERP evidence.
Lehtonen M; Hultén A; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Cunillera T; Tuomainen J; Laine M
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1362-71. PubMed ID: 22387606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Not just semantics: strong frequency and weak cognate effects on semantic association in bilinguals.
Antón-Méndez I; Gollan TH
Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):723-39. PubMed ID: 20852236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition.
Ishida T
J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):523-536. PubMed ID: 29168115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of native language experience on Mandarin lexical tone processing in proficient second language learners.
Yu K; Li L; Chen Y; Zhou Y; Wang R; Zhang Y; Li P
Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13448. PubMed ID: 31355474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When having two names facilitates lexical selection: Similar results in the picture-word task from translation distractors in bilinguals and synonym distractors in monolinguals.
Dylman AS; Barry C
Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():151-171. PubMed ID: 29172105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Language modality shapes the dynamics of word and sign recognition.
Villameriel S; Costello B; Dias P; Giezen M; Carreiras M
Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103979. PubMed ID: 31234112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
