These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31580129)
1. Valuing the Q in QALYs: Does providing patients' ratings affect population values? Murphy RP; Boyce CJ; Dolan P; Wood AM Health Psychol; 2020 Jan; 39(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 31580129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health State Values Derived from People with Multiple Sclerosis for a Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measure: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-Eight Dimensions-Patient Version (MSIS-8D-P). Goodwin E; Green C; Hawton A Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 30442282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Valuing the health state 'tinnitus': differences between patients and the general public. Happich M; von Lengerke T Hear Res; 2005 Sep; 207(1-2):50-8. PubMed ID: 15919164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Valuations of epilepsy-specific health states: a comparison of patients with epilepsy and the general population. Mulhern B; Rowen D; Snape D; Jacoby A; Marson T; Hughes D; Baker G; Brazier J Epilepsy Behav; 2014 Jul; 36():12-7. PubMed ID: 24836527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health-state valuations for pertussis: methods for valuing short-term health states. Lee GM; Salomon JA; LeBaron CW; Lieu TA Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Mar; 3():17. PubMed ID: 15780145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries. Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC; Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm. Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are people consistent when trading time for health? Oliver A; Wolff J Econ Hum Biol; 2014 Dec; 15():41-6. PubMed ID: 24953641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations. Al Sayah F; Mladenovic A; Gaebel K; Xie F; Johnson JA Qual Life Res; 2016 Jan; 25(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26216584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of patient and population values for health states in varicose veins patients. Ratcliffe J; Brazier J; Palfreyman S; Michaels J Health Econ; 2007 Apr; 16(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 17006963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing quality of life in a clinical study on heart rehabilitation patients: how well do value sets based on given or experienced health states reflect patients' valuations? Leidl R; Schweikert B; Hahmann H; Steinacker JM; Reitmeir P Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Mar; 14():48. PubMed ID: 27005466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient and public preferences for health states associated with AMD. Butt T; Dunbar HM; Morris S; Orr S; Rubin GS Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 90(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 23811607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Misconceptions About Health-Related Quality of Life Affect General Population Valuations of Health States? Murphy RP; Boyce CJ; Dolan P; Brown GDA; Wood AM Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):750-759. PubMed ID: 36328325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) in a large longitudinal sample of the U.S. community-dwelling older population. Jia H; Lubetkin EI; DeMichele K; Stark DS; Zack MM; Thompson WW Disabil Health J; 2019 Oct; 12(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 31167742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A social preference valuations set for EQ-5D health states in Flanders, Belgium. Cleemput I Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 19582490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis? Parkin D; Devlin N Health Econ; 2006 Jul; 15(7):653-64. PubMed ID: 16498700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of age on health state valuations. Dolan P J Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Jan; 5(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 10787582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set. Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic evaluation in schistosomiasis: valuation of health states preferences. A research note. Kirigia JM Health Econ; 1998 Sep; 7(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 9809712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]