These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31580141)
1. Challenges and suggestions for defining replication "success" when effects may be heterogeneous: Comment on Hedges and Schauer (2019). Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 31580141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments. Schauer JM; Hedges LV Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward. Pearson MR; Schwebel FJ; Richards DK; Witkiewitz K Psychol Addict Behav; 2022 May; 36(3):260-270. PubMed ID: 34435835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success. Kunert R Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. Kenny DA; Judd CM Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science. Moreau D; Corballis MC J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research": Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018). Psychol Bull; 2019 Jul; 145(7):764. PubMed ID: 31192651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Replication and robustness in developmental research. Duncan GJ; Engel M; Claessens A; Dowsett CJ Dev Psychol; 2014 Nov; 50(11):2417-25. PubMed ID: 25243330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size. Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM; van Assen MALM Psychol Bull; 2020 Oct; 146(10):922-940. PubMed ID: 32700942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is replication possible without fidelity? Ellefson MR; Oppenheimer DM Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 35049324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Open Science Collaboration Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility. Van Bavel JJ; Mende-Siedlecki P; Brady WJ; Reinero DA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6454-9. PubMed ID: 27217556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology. Boyce V; Mathur M; Frank MC R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Nov; 10(11):231240. PubMed ID: 38026006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. Errington TM; Mathur M; Soderberg CK; Denis A; Perfito N; Iorns E; Nosek BA Elife; 2021 Dec; 10():. PubMed ID: 34874005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology. Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]