227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31580496)
1. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
Perlin MW; Legler MM; Spencer CE; Smith JL; Allan WP; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1430-47. PubMed ID: 21827458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.
Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1263-76. PubMed ID: 26258391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New York State TrueAllele ® casework validation study.
Perlin MW; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1458-66. PubMed ID: 23865896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. STRmix
Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
Thompson WC
J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TrueAllele casework on Virginia DNA mixture evidence: computer and manual interpretation in 72 reported criminal cases.
Perlin MW; Dormer K; Hornyak J; Schiermeier-Wood L; Greenspoon S
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92837. PubMed ID: 24667531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simplification of complex DNA profiles using front end cell separation and probabilistic modeling.
Stokes NA; Stanciu CE; Brocato ER; Ehrhardt CJ; Greenspoon SA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():205-212. PubMed ID: 30055432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
