These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31580905)

  • 21. Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement.
    Critchfield TS; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Mar; 59(2):373-87. PubMed ID: 8454959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):314-24. PubMed ID: 24740374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors that encourage generalization from extinction to test reduce resurgence of an extinguished operant response.
    Trask S; Keim CL; Bouton ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jul; 110(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 29911341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resurgence in humans: Reducing relapse by increasing generalization between treatment and testing.
    Thrailkill EA; Ameden WC; Bouton ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):338-349. PubMed ID: 31033312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.
    Lieving GA; Reilly MP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 17002227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat.
    Cardinal RN; Cheung TH
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 6():9. PubMed ID: 15691387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioral control by the response-reinforcer correlation.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Sep; 110(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 30073649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Control of response duration by delayed reinforcers: A systematic replication.
    Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103920. PubMed ID: 31374227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Operant generalization in quail neonates after intradimensional training: Distinguishing positive and negative reinforcement.
    Schneider SM; Lickliter R
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19712731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acquisition of instrumental conditioned reinforcement is resistant to the devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus.
    Parkinson JA; Roberts AC; Everitt BJ; Di Ciano P
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Jan; 58(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 15844375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response suppression on DRL by rats with septal damage.
    Ellen P; Mokohon L; Richardson WK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Jun; 92(3):511-21. PubMed ID: 681566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.
    Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):129-39. PubMed ID: 20676272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus compounding in interval timing: the modality-duration relationship of the anchor durations results in qualitatively different response patterns to the compound cue.
    Swanton DN; Matell MS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 20718546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of sucrose availability and pre-running on the intrinsic value of wheel running as an operant and a reinforcing consequence.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():35-42. PubMed ID: 24295809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Keely J; Feola T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):229-47. PubMed ID: 17970417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.
    Reed P; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15762379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.