441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31581815)
1. Bias in retrospective analyses of biomarker effect using data from an outcome-adaptive randomized trial.
Ji L; McShane LM; Krailo M; Sposto R
Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 31581815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive adjustment of the randomization ratio using historical control data.
Hobbs BP; Carlin BP; Sargent DJ
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):430-40. PubMed ID: 23690095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the design and the analysis of stratified biomarker trials in the presence of measurement error.
Halabi S; Lin CY; Liu A
Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(12):2783-2799. PubMed ID: 33724513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.
Shepherd BE; Shaw PA; Dodd LE
Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 22848072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer--a step toward personalized medicine.
Zhou X; Liu S; Kim ES; Herbst RS; Lee JJ
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 18559407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
Lu X; Shan G
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.
Karrison TG; Huo D; Chappell R
Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):506-22. PubMed ID: 14500050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re-randomization tests in clinical trials.
Proschan MA; Dodd LE
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(12):2292-2302. PubMed ID: 30672002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials.
Wathen JK; Thall PF
Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):432-440. PubMed ID: 28982263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interim analysis of binary outcome data in clinical trials: a comparison of five estimators.
Lu QS; Chow SC; Tse SK
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):400-410. PubMed ID: 30599798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive randomization in biomarker-driven phase II studies.
Barry WT; Perou CM; Marcom PK; Carey LA; Ibrahim JG
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 24836519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
Gu X; Lee JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Weighted re-randomization tests for minimization with unbalanced allocation.
Han B; Yu M; McEntegart D
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 23760923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical controversies in clinical research: scientific and ethical problems with adaptive randomization in comparative clinical trials.
Thall P; Fox P; Wathen J
Ann Oncol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1621-8. PubMed ID: 25979922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
Schouten HJ
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methods for control allocation in multiple arm studies using response adaptive randomization.
Viele K; Broglio K; McGlothlin A; Saville BR
Clin Trials; 2020 Feb; 17(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 31630567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
