These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31581815)

  • 1. Bias in retrospective analyses of biomarker effect using data from an outcome-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ji L; McShane LM; Krailo M; Sposto R
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 31581815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive adjustment of the randomization ratio using historical control data.
    Hobbs BP; Carlin BP; Sargent DJ
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):430-40. PubMed ID: 23690095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the design and the analysis of stratified biomarker trials in the presence of measurement error.
    Halabi S; Lin CY; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(12):2783-2799. PubMed ID: 33724513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.
    Shepherd BE; Shaw PA; Dodd LE
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 22848072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian adaptive design for targeted therapy development in lung cancer--a step toward personalized medicine.
    Zhou X; Liu S; Kim ES; Herbst RS; Lee JJ
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 18559407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.
    Karrison TG; Huo D; Chappell R
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):506-22. PubMed ID: 14500050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-randomization tests in clinical trials.
    Proschan MA; Dodd LE
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(12):2292-2302. PubMed ID: 30672002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wathen JK; Thall PF
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):432-440. PubMed ID: 28982263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalized outcome-adaptive sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design.
    Yang X; Cheng Y; Thall PF; Wahed AS
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 39106124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interim analysis of binary outcome data in clinical trials: a comparison of five estimators.
    Lu QS; Chow SC; Tse SK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):400-410. PubMed ID: 30599798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive randomization in biomarker-driven phase II studies.
    Barry WT; Perou CM; Marcom PK; Carey LA; Ibrahim JG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):66-88. PubMed ID: 24836519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
    Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
    Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted re-randomization tests for minimization with unbalanced allocation.
    Han B; Yu M; McEntegart D
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 23760923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical controversies in clinical research: scientific and ethical problems with adaptive randomization in comparative clinical trials.
    Thall P; Fox P; Wathen J
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1621-8. PubMed ID: 25979922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.