222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31582121)
1. Analysis of dental compensation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim HJ; Hong M; Park HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 31582121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-dimensional analysis of skeletal and dental characteristics in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry.
Yu J; Hu Y; Huang M; Chen J; Ding X; Zheng L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):449-462. PubMed ID: 29562577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular asymmetry types and differences in dental compensations of Class III patients analyzed with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim HJ; Noh HK; Park HS
Angle Orthod; 2023 Nov; 93(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 37407513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
Tyan S; Park HS; Janchivdorj M; Han SH; Kim SJ; Ahn HW
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 26192894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients.
Ahn J; Kim SJ; Lee JY; Chung CJ; Kim KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):148-156. PubMed ID: 28024769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone-beam computed tomography study of mandibular morphology and tooth compensation in asymmetrical patients.
Marques FBC; Siqueira de Lima L; Coqueiro RDS; Pithon MM; Ruellas ACO; Maciel JVB; Nojima MDCG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Aug; 164(2):265-275. PubMed ID: 36967314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse dental compensation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry.
Lee JY; Han SH; Ryu HS; Lee HM; Kim SC
Korean J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 48(6):357-366. PubMed ID: 30450328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual inclination of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Hu X; Huang X; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):503-515. PubMed ID: 32241357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of the three-dimensional skeletal variables with self-recognition of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III patients.
Lim SW; Jeon JB; Moon RJ; Oh S; Park A; Oh MH; Kim MS; Hwang HS; Cho JH
Angle Orthod; 2022 Jul; 92(4):512-520. PubMed ID: 35166777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism.
You KH; Kim KH; Lee KJ; Baik HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):685-691. PubMed ID: 29706216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after surgical-orthodontic treatment.
Ming Y; Hu Y; Wang T; Zhang J; Li Y; Xu W; Tan H; Ye H; Zheng L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(4):783-798. PubMed ID: 32417830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?
Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Facial Asymmetry According to the Occlusal Cant and Menton Deviation.
Kwon SM; Baik HS; Jung HD; Jang W; Choi YJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 77(6):1261-1275. PubMed ID: 30794815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does maxillary yaw exist in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry?
Noh HK; Park HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):573-587. PubMed ID: 34332794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
