BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31582123)

  • 21. Skeletal Class lll severe openbite treatment using implant anchorage.
    Sakai Y; Kuroda S; Murshid SA; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18193965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Class III malocclusion with missing maxillary lateral incisors.
    Cozzani M; Lombardo L; Gracco A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 21392695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Alternative Approach for Space Opening in a Bilateral Maxillary Lateral Incisor Agenesis Patient using Miniplates.
    Meros GC; Shoji A; Suzuki S; Paranhos LR; Manfroi R; Claus J; Garcez A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1198-1205. PubMed ID: 29208799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maxillary protraction at early ages. The revolution of new bone anchorage appliances.
    Solano-Mendoza B; Iglesias-Linares A; Yañez-Vico RM; Mendoza-Mendoza A; Alió-Sanz JJ; Solano-Reina E
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 23534334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
    Moon W; Wu KW; MacGinnis M; Sung J; Chu H; Youssef G; Machado A
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Lee SH; Koh SD; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion with agenesis of lateral incisor and unerupted canine.
    Vieira BB; Sanguino AC; Moreira MR; Morizono EN; Matsumoto MA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 24094017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia.
    Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 16448286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors. Part I: Canine substitution.
    Kokich VO; Kinzer GA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 15934680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Lee YS; Park JH; Kim J; Lee NK; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Oct; 162(4):520-528. PubMed ID: 35933257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interdisciplinary treatment of a patient with bilateral cleft lip and palate and congenitally missing and transposed teeth.
    Germec-Cakan D; Canter HI; Cakan U; Demir B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):381-92. PubMed ID: 24582029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols.
    Elnagar MH; Elshourbagy E; Ghobashy S; Khedr M; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):751-762. PubMed ID: 27871701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects.
    Clemente R; Contardo L; Greco C; Di Lenarda R; Perinetti G
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():7946019. PubMed ID: 30057910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early orthodontic intervention followed by fixed appliance therapy in a patient with a severe Class III malocclusion and cleft lip and palate.
    Zhang H; Deng F; Wang H; Huang Q; Zhang Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):726-36. PubMed ID: 24182589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early treatment of class III malocclusion.
    Kumar A; Rohilla A; Tandon P; Nager A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 25109058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid palatal expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class III patients.
    Maino G; Turci Y; Arreghini A; Paoletto E; Siciliani G; Lombardo L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):262-268. PubMed ID: 29407504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular dentition distalization.
    Jing Y; Han X; Guo Y; Li J; Bai D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):877-87. PubMed ID: 23726338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of intermaxillary forces in early treatment of maxillary deficient class III patients: results of a case series.
    Coscia G; Addabbo F; Peluso V; D'Ambrosio E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e350-4. PubMed ID: 22421469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distalization of the maxillary and mandibular dentitions with miniscrew anchorage in a patient with moderate Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Chen G; Teng F; Xu TM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 26926028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.