These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31582123)

  • 41. Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.
    Nagaraj K; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 18575310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the change in inferior sclera exposure after maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Kale B; Buyukcavus MH; Esenlik E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul; 21(7):854-858. PubMed ID: 29984715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Double-archwire mechanics using temporary anchorage devices to relocate ectopically impacted maxillary canines.
    Kim SH; Choo H; Hwang YS; Chung KR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):255-66. PubMed ID: 18834008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Orthopaedic and orthodontic treatment with hyrax, Class III elastics on mandibular miniplates, maxillary mini-implants in a Class III adolescent: A case report.
    Ganesh G; Tripathi T; Rai P
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):827-838. PubMed ID: 32654977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interdisciplinary Approach for Management of Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A Case Report.
    Agrawal A; Jain N; Jose NP; Shetty S
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):15-7. PubMed ID: 27029086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interdisciplinary treatment of a class III patient with congenitally absent maxillary lateral incisors.
    Oliveira DD; de Oliveira BF; da Mata Cid Pinto LS; Figueiredo DS; Pithon MM; Seraidarian PI
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):242-53. PubMed ID: 23910181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rapid Maxillary Expansion without Posterior Anchorage.
    Oliveira A; Amaral C
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 27319047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza RA; Rino Neto J; de Paiva JB
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Sep; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 31475309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Maxillary protaction with zygomatic anchorage in a growing class III patient.
    Aldaz J; Andrade D; Aguilar E; Bravo M
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 31056418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The application of skeletal anchorage in the correction of anterior open bite and skeletal Class III malocclusion: a paradigm shift.
    Tarraf NE
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2012 Apr; 21():113-9. PubMed ID: 24783846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Class I malocclusion treatment: influence of a missing mandibular incisor on anterior guidance.
    Barros SE; Janson G; Torres FC; de Freitas MR; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes.
    Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Miniplates and screws in treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with missing posterior teeth. A case report.
    Rattanayatikul C; Godfrey K; Chawengchettanon J; Vattraraphoudet T
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 17203582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Camouflage treatment for class III malocclusion combined with traction of an impacted maxillary central incisor.
    Closs LQ; Mundstock KS; Ribeiro DS; Reston EG; Silva AN
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 20819408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Early class III treatment with hybrid rapid palatal expander combined with facemask.
    Lombardo L; Albertini P; Cervinara F; Brucculeri L; Siciliani G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 32534993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Closure of severe skeletal anterior open bite with zygomatic anchorage.
    Seres L; Kocsis A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 19276813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes between temporary anchorage devices and Class III elastics in Class III malocclusions.
    Nakamura M; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Murakami T; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28554457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage: A possible alternative to orthognathic surgery.
    Cha BK; Park JH; Choi DS; Jang I
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 33119188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.