These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31582249)

  • 1. A review of mammographic lesion localisation and work up imaging in Australia in the digital era.
    Spuur K
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Nov; 25(4):385-391. PubMed ID: 31582249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography.
    Morel JC; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Peacock C; Evans DR; Rahim R; Goligher J; Michell MJ
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Nov; 69(11):1112-6. PubMed ID: 25100302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality mammographic image. A review of its components.
    Rickard MT
    Australas Radiol; 1989 Nov; 33(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 2633732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. With the Advent of Tomosynthesis in the Workup of Mammographic Abnormality, is Spot Compression Mammography Now Obsolete? An Initial Clinical Experience.
    Ni Mhuircheartaigh N; Coffey L; Fleming H; O' Doherty A; McNally S
    Breast J; 2017 Sep; 23(5):509-518. PubMed ID: 28252233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
    Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of spot compression-magnification and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 1523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast compression parameters among women screened with standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in a randomized controlled trial.
    Waade GG; Holen Å; Sebuødegård S; Aase H; Pedersen K; Hanestad B; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Mar; 61(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 31342757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Tomosynthesis: Practical Considerations.
    Friedewald SM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 28411675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies on a digital breast 3D-tomosynthesis system.
    Viala J; Gignier P; Perret B; Hovasse C; Hovasse D; Chancelier-Galan MD; Bornet G; Hamrouni A; Lasry JL; Convard JP
    Breast J; 2013; 19(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 23252555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA
    Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 19474373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative breast density analysis using tomosynthesis and comparison with MRI and digital mammography.
    Moon WK; Chang JF; Lo CM; Chang JM; Lee SH; Shin SU; Huang CS; Chang RF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Feb; 154():99-107. PubMed ID: 29249352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.