These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31583422)

  • 1. Environmental DNA: An Emerging Tool in Ecological Assessment.
    Wang P; Yan Z; Yang S; Wang S; Zheng X; Fan J; Zhang T
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2019 Nov; 103(5):651-656. PubMed ID: 31583422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?
    Adams CIM; Knapp M; Gemmell NJ; Jeunen GJ; Bunce M; Lamare MD; Taylor HR
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30832286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concurrent visual encounter sampling validates eDNA selectivity and sensitivity for the endangered wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta).
    Akre TS; Parker LD; Ruther E; Maldonado JE; Lemmon L; McInerney NR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215586. PubMed ID: 31017960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marine environmental DNA: Approaches, applications, and opportunities.
    Eble JA; Daly-Engel TS; DiBattista JD; Koziol A; Gaither MR
    Adv Mar Biol; 2020; 86(1):141-169. PubMed ID: 32600544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water.
    Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling Designs for Landscape-level eDNA Monitoring Programs.
    Erickson RA; Merkes CM; Mize EL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Sep; 15(5):760-771. PubMed ID: 30963692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonlinear relationship between Silver Carp density and their eDNA concentration in a large river.
    Coulter DP; Wang P; Coulter AA; Van Susteren GE; Eichmiller JJ; Garvey JE; Sorensen PW
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218823. PubMed ID: 31242242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.
    Harrison JB; Sunday JM; Rogers SM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Nov; 286(1915):20191409. PubMed ID: 31744434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
    Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of fish biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Ahn H; Kume M; Terashima Y; Ye F; Kameyama S; Miya M; Yamashita Y; Kasai A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0231127. PubMed ID: 33022692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches.
    Pont D; Valentini A; Rocle M; Maire A; Delaigue O; Jean P; Dejean T
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):354-366. PubMed ID: 31644817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis).
    Brys R; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; Mauvisseau Q; Auwerx J; Sweet M; Mergeay J
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):399-414. PubMed ID: 32154579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA.
    Nevers MB; Przybyla-Kelly K; Shively D; Morris CC; Dickey J; Byappanahalli MN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244086. PubMed ID: 33370371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring.
    Bohmann K; Evans A; Gilbert MT; Carvalho GR; Creer S; Knapp M; Yu DW; de Bruyn M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Jun; 29(6):358-67. PubMed ID: 24821515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning.
    Seymour M; Edwards FK; Cosby BJ; Bista I; Scarlett PM; Brailsford FL; Glanville HC; de Bruyn M; Carvalho GR; Creer S
    Commun Biol; 2021 May; 4(1):512. PubMed ID: 33941836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traditional trapping methods outperform eDNA sampling for introduced semi-aquatic snakes.
    Rose JP; Wademan C; Weir S; Wood JS; Todd BD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219244. PubMed ID: 31265475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diazinon negatively affects the integrity of environmental DNA stability: a case study with common carp (Cyprinus carpio).
    Pourmoghadam MN; Poorbagher H; de Oliveira Fernandes JM; Jafari O
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):672. PubMed ID: 31650301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the reliability of eDNA data interpretation.
    Burian A; Mauvisseau Q; Bulling M; Domisch S; Qian S; Sweet M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 33655639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The application of CRISPR-Cas for single species identification from environmental DNA.
    Williams MA; O'Grady J; Ball B; Carlsson J; de Eyto E; McGinnity P; Jennings E; Regan F; Parle-McDermott A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1106-1114. PubMed ID: 31177615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.