These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31583552)

  • 1. Quantifying Subresolution 3D Morphology of Bone with Clinical Computed Tomography.
    Karhula SS; Finnilä MAJ; Rytky SJO; Cooper DM; Thevenot J; Valkealahti M; Pritzker KPH; Haapea M; Joukainen A; Lehenkari P; Kröger H; Korhonen RK; Nieminen HJ; Saarakkala S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 48(2):595-605. PubMed ID: 31583552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    He RT; Tu MG; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Wu J; Hsu JT
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30674282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of bone microstructure in the wrist using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mys K; Stockmans F; Vereecke E; van Lenthe GH
    Bone; 2018 Sep; 114():206-214. PubMed ID: 29909060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Study of Multidetector Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, and Computed Microtomography on Trabecular Bone Structures in the Human Mandible: An Ex Vivo Study.
    Sarmento VA; de Oliveira Gonzalez TFL; Lopes RT; Novaes M; Borges SM; Rubira-Bullen IRF
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):552-556. PubMed ID: 34270480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation Between Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and High-Resolution Peripheral Computed Tomography for Assessment of Wrist Bone Microstructure.
    Mys K; Varga P; Gueorguiev B; Hemmatian H; Stockmans F; van Lenthe GH
    J Bone Miner Res; 2019 May; 34(5):867-874. PubMed ID: 30912861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of biomarkers obtained from cone beam computed tomography in assessing the internal trabecular structure of the mandibular condyle.
    Ebrahim FH; Ruellas ACO; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Jepsen K; Wolford L; Goncalves JR; Cevidanes LHS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Dec; 124(6):588-599. PubMed ID: 29055644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting Trabecular Bone Stiffness from Clinical Cone-Beam CT and HR-pQCT Data; an In Vitro Study Using Finite Element Analysis.
    Klintström E; Klintström B; Moreno R; Brismar TB; Pahr DH; Smedby Ö
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161101. PubMed ID: 27513664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association between subchondral bone structure and osteoarthritis histopathological grade.
    Finnilä MAJ; Thevenot J; Aho OM; Tiitu V; Rautiainen J; Kauppinen S; Nieminen MT; Pritzker K; Valkealahti M; Lehenkari P; Saarakkala S
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Apr; 35(4):785-792. PubMed ID: 27227565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical cone beam computed tomography compared to high-resolution peripheral computed tomography in the assessment of distal radius bone.
    de Charry C; Boutroy S; Ellouz R; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Follet H; Pialat JB
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Oct; 27(10):3073-82. PubMed ID: 27121345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of jawbone trabecular bone structure amongst osteoporotic women by cone-beam computed tomography: the OSTEOSYR project.
    Barngkgei I; Al Haffar I; Shaarani E; Khattab R; Mashlah A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 Nov; 7(4):332-340. PubMed ID: 26097193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT.
    Hsu JT; Wang SP; Huang HL; Chen YJ; Wu J; Tsai MT
    J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2611-8. PubMed ID: 24011361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of maxillary trabecular microstructure as an indicator of implant stability by using 2 cone beam computed tomography systems and micro-computed tomography.
    Kulah K; Gulsahi A; Kamburoğlu K; Geneci F; Ocak M; Celik HH; Ozen T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):247-256. PubMed ID: 30595501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-resolution-cone beam tomography analysis of bone microarchitecture in patients with acromegaly and radiological vertebral fractures.
    Maffezzoni F; Maddalo M; Frara S; Mezzone M; Zorza I; Baruffaldi F; Doglietto F; Mazziotti G; Maroldi R; Giustina A
    Endocrine; 2016 Nov; 54(2):532-542. PubMed ID: 27601020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional evaluation of human jaw bone microarchitecture: correlation between the microarchitectural parameters of cone beam computed tomography and micro-computer tomography.
    Kim JE; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Dec; 120(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 26548728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full-field experimental analysis of the influence of microstructural parameters on the mechanical properties of humeral head trabecular bone.
    Kusins J; Knowles N; Martensson N; P Columbus M; Athwal GS; M Ferreira L
    J Orthop Res; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2048-2056. PubMed ID: 34910321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluating Bone Density and Cortical Bone Thickness at the Implant Site: Micro-Computed Tomography and Histologic Analysis.
    Suttapreyasri S; Suapear P; Leepong N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2026-2031. PubMed ID: 29894463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-based automatic classification of trabecular bone pattern can assist radiographic bone quality assessment at dental implant site.
    Nicolielo LFP; Van Dessel J; van Lenthe GH; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180437. PubMed ID: 30175923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep.
    Muhammad AMA; Ibrahim N; Ahmad R; Asif MK; Radzi Z; Zaini ZM; Razak HRA
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 32041589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.