495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31584070)
1. Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices.
McMordie JH; Schmidt KP; Gard AP; Gillis CC
Neurosurgery; 2020 Feb; 86(2):E147-E155. PubMed ID: 31584070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.
Khalifeh JM; Dibble CF; Stecher P; Dorward I; Hawasli AH; Ray WZ
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Oct; 19(5):518-529. PubMed ID: 32433773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alvi MA; Kurian SJ; Wahood W; Goyal A; Elder BD; Bydon M
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():596-606.e1. PubMed ID: 30954733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].
Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.
Carlson BB; Saville P; Dowdell J; Goto R; Vaishnav A; Gang CH; McAnany S; Albert TJ; Qureshi S
Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 30529420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Cong GT; Tsiouris AJ; James AR; Paulo D; Elowitz E; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):623-35. PubMed ID: 24702513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers.
Uribe JS; Smith DA; Dakwar E; Baaj AA; Mundis GM; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Akbarnia BA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):476-85. PubMed ID: 22938554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Chen X; Wu LL; Yang ZC; Qiu YJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 37211931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages: Radiological and Clinical Results from a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
Choi WS; Kim JS; Hur JW; Seong JH
Neurosurgery; 2018 Mar; 82(3):289-298. PubMed ID: 28499016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
