154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31584119)
1. Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.
Hjaltadottir H; Hebelka H; Molinder C; Brisby H; Baranto A
Eur Spine J; 2020 Jan; 29(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 31584119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).
Hermansen E; Moen G; Barstad J; Birketvedt R; Indrekvam K
Eur Spine J; 2013 Aug; 22(8):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23494757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.
Kim YK; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Kang HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1342-7. PubMed ID: 23797506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.
Masala S; Marcia S; Taglieri A; Chiaravalloti A; Calabria E; Raguso M; Piras E; Simonetti G
Interv Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 22(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 26769739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fang X; Li J; Wang L; Liu L; Lv W; Tang Z; Gao D
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3200-3210. PubMed ID: 36814030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of radiological parameters associated with decreased fractional anisotropy values on diffusion tensor imaging in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Wang X; Wang H; Sun C; Zhou S; Meng T; Lv F; Ma X; Xia X; Jiang J
Eur Spine J; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1397-1405. PubMed ID: 29700619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study.
Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Banitalebi H; Indrekvam K; Brisby H
Eur Spine J; 2024 Jun; 33(6):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 38587545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.
Lim YS; Mun JU; Seo MS; Sang BH; Bang YS; Kang KN; Koh JW; Kim YU
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(49):e9087. PubMed ID: 29245329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.
Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Pacifico D; O'Riordan D; Nauer S; von Büren M; Schizas C
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2552-2564. PubMed ID: 28856447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.
Hong P; Liu Y; Li H
J Invest Surg; 2015 Feb; 28(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 25025237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.
van den Akker-van Marle ME; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25452018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis: a neurophysiological perspective.
Schizas C; Pralong E; Tzioupis C; Kulik G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2113-7. PubMed ID: 24026157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?
Finkenstaedt T; Del Grande F; Bolog N; Ulrich NH; Tok S; Burgstaller JM; Steurer J; Chung CB; Andreisek G; Winklhofer S;
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 29651713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals.
Danielson B; Willén J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(23):2601-6. PubMed ID: 11725242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.
Willén J; Danielson B; Gaulitz A; Niklason T; Schönström N; Hansson T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2968-76. PubMed ID: 9431634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new ceramic interspinous process spacer for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Yano S; Hida K; Seki T; Aoyama T; Akino M; Iwasaki Y
Neurosurgery; 2008 Jul; 63(1 Suppl 1):ONS108-13; discussion ONS114. PubMed ID: 18728587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
