These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31584177)

  • 1. A Broad Host Range Plasmid-Based Roadmap for ssDNA-Based Recombineering in Gram-Negative Bacteria.
    Aparicio T; de Lorenzo V; Martínez-García E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2075():383-398. PubMed ID: 31584177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of ssDNA recombineering and CRISPR-Cas9 for Pseudomonas putida KT2440 genome editing.
    Wu Z; Chen Z; Gao X; Li J; Shang G
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Mar; 103(6):2783-2795. PubMed ID: 30762073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A high-efficiency recombineering system with PCR-based ssDNA in Bacillus subtilis mediated by the native phage recombinase GP35.
    Sun Z; Deng A; Hu T; Wu J; Sun Q; Bai H; Zhang G; Wen T
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jun; 99(12):5151-62. PubMed ID: 25750031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A standardized workflow for surveying recombinases expands bacterial genome-editing capabilities.
    Ricaurte DE; Martínez-García E; Nyerges Á; Pál C; de Lorenzo V; Aparicio T
    Microb Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 11(1):176-188. PubMed ID: 29094478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CRISPR/Cas9-enhanced ssDNA recombineering for Pseudomonas putida.
    Aparicio T; de Lorenzo V; Martínez-García E
    Microb Biotechnol; 2019 Sep; 12(5):1076-1089. PubMed ID: 31237429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A set of recombineering plasmids for gram-negative bacteria.
    Datta S; Costantino N; Court DL
    Gene; 2006 Sep; 379():109-15. PubMed ID: 16750601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification and analysis of recombineering functions from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and their phages.
    Datta S; Costantino N; Zhou X; Court DL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Feb; 105(5):1626-31. PubMed ID: 18230724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient point mutagenesis in mycobacteria using single-stranded DNA recombineering: characterization of antimycobacterial drug targets.
    van Kessel JC; Hatfull GF
    Mol Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 67(5):1094-107. PubMed ID: 18221264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient and Scalable Precision Genome Editing in
    Penewit K; Holmes EA; McLean K; Ren M; Waalkes A; Salipante SJ
    mBio; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 29463653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coupling ssDNA recombineering with CRISPR-Cas9 for Escherichia coli DnaG mutations.
    Li J; Sun J; Gao X; Wu Z; Shang G
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Apr; 103(8):3559-3570. PubMed ID: 30879090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Development of a new recombineering system by gap repair].
    Li SH; Hong X; Yu M; Chen W; Huang CF; Zhou JG
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 May; 32(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 16018266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recombineering in Non-Model Bacteria.
    Corts A; Thomason LC; Costantino N; Court DL
    Curr Protoc; 2022 Dec; 2(12):e605. PubMed ID: 36546891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construction and functional characterization of an integrative form lambda Red recombineering Escherichia coli strain.
    Song J; Dong H; Ma C; Zhao B; Shang G
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Aug; 309(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 20618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-Efficiency Multi-site Genomic Editing (HEMSE) Made Easy.
    Aparicio T; de Lorenzo V; Martínez-García E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2479():37-52. PubMed ID: 35583731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Ssr protein (T1E_1405) from Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E enables oligonucleotide-based recombineering in platform strain P. putida EM42.
    Aparicio T; Jensen SI; Nielsen AT; de Lorenzo V; Martínez-García E
    Biotechnol J; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1309-1319. PubMed ID: 27367544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CRISPR/Cas9-Assisted Seamless Genome Editing in Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Application in
    Zhou D; Jiang Z; Pang Q; Zhu Y; Wang Q; Qi Q
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 85(21):. PubMed ID: 31444197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recombineering-Mediated Genome Editing in Burkholderiales Strains.
    Wang X; Liu J; Zheng W; Zhang Y; Bian X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2479():21-36. PubMed ID: 35583730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9 in Lactobacillus plantarum Revealed That Editing Outcomes Can Vary Across Strains and Between Methods.
    Leenay RT; Vento JM; Shah M; Martino ME; Leulier F; Beisel CL
    Biotechnol J; 2019 Mar; 14(3):e1700583. PubMed ID: 30156038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phage recombinases and their applications.
    Murphy KC
    Adv Virus Res; 2012; 83():367-414. PubMed ID: 22748814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient and Precise Genome Editing in
    Corts AD; Thomason LC; Gill RT; Gralnick JA
    ACS Synth Biol; 2019 Aug; 8(8):1877-1889. PubMed ID: 31277550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.