These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31584184)

  • 61. Kin but less than kind: within-group male relatedness does not increase female fitness in seed beetles.
    Berg EC; Lind MI; Monahan S; Bricout S; Maklakov AA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Sep; 286(1910):20191664. PubMed ID: 31506055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Evidence for a short-range sex pheromone in female Maladera matrida beetle.
    Falach L; Cojocaru M; Shani A
    J Chem Ecol; 2003 Mar; 29(3):603-13. PubMed ID: 12757322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Female multiple mating in wild and laboratory populations of the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata.
    Haddrill PR; Shuker DM; Amos W; Majerus ME; Mayes S
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jul; 17(13):3189-97. PubMed ID: 18522693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.
    Head ML; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18067568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes.
    McLain DK
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1085-95. PubMed ID: 16136806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Sexual selection, antennae length and the mating advantage of large males in Asellus aquaticus.
    Bertin A; Cézilly F
    J Evol Biol; 2003 May; 16(3):491-500. PubMed ID: 14635849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2003 Oct; 57(10):2326-34. PubMed ID: 14628920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.
    Hollis B; Houle D; Kawecki TJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 26395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection.
    Székely T; Reynolds JD; Figuerola J
    Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1404-13. PubMed ID: 11005306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt.
    Jones AG; Arguello JR; Arnold SJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Dec; 269(1509):2533-9. PubMed ID: 12573067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Digest: Sexual selection and conflict in a novel environment.
    Vincent AM
    Evolution; 2018 Mar; 72(3):713-714. PubMed ID: 29380344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 15212383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Testing for direct and indirect effects of mate choice by manipulating female choosiness.
    Maklakov AA; Arnqvist G
    Curr Biol; 2009 Dec; 19(22):1903-6. PubMed ID: 19853448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Parental Care: When the Sex Has to Stop.
    Royle NJ
    Curr Biol; 2016 Jun; 26(11):R478-80. PubMed ID: 27269728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.
    Li XY; Holman L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.