BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31584211)

  • 1. Use of standardized methods to improve extinction-risk classification.
    Mothes CC; Clements SL; Hewavithana DK; Howell HJ; David AS; Leventhal ND; Searcy CA
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):754-761. PubMed ID: 31584211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Associated with Listing Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Smith-Hicks KN; Morrison ML
    Environ Manage; 2021 Apr; 67(4):563-573. PubMed ID: 33638664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit decision framing as an unrecognized source of confusion in endangered species classification.
    Cummings JW; Converse SJ; Smith DR; Morey S; Runge MC
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1246-1254. PubMed ID: 29987850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with preemptive conservation under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Treakle T; Epanchin-Niell R; Iacona GD
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Oct; 37(5):e14104. PubMed ID: 37185993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria.
    Keith DA; Mahony M; Hines H; Elith J; Regan TJ; Baumgartner JB; Hunter D; Heard GW; Mitchell NJ; Parris KM; Penman T; Scheele B; Simpson CC; Tingley R; Tracy CR; West M; Akçakaya HR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 24512339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating climate and ocean change into extinction risk assessments for 82 coral species.
    Brainard RE; Weijerman M; Eakin CM; McElhany P; Miller MW; Patterson M; Piniak GA; Dunlap MJ; Birkeland C
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1169-78. PubMed ID: 24299083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative tools for implementing the new definition of significant portion of the range in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Earl JE; Nicol S; Wiederholt R; Diffendorfer JE; Semmens D; Flockhart DTT; Mattsson BJ; McCracken G; Norris DR; Thogmartin WE; López-Hoffman L
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 28574183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment.
    Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1297-1306. PubMed ID: 27030933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attributes of preemptive conservation efforts for species precluded from listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Stanley AE; Epanchin-Niell R; Treakle T; Iacona GD
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14200. PubMed ID: 37817673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing recovery of spectacled eiders using a Bayesian decision analysis.
    Dunham KD; Osnas EE; Frost CJ; Fischer JB; Grand JB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253895. PubMed ID: 34197512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of policy, law, management, research, and advocacy failings to the recent extinctions of three Australian vertebrate species.
    Woinarski JC; Garnett ST; Legge SM; Lindenmayer DB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 27704619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scaling range sizes to threats for robust predictions of risks to biodiversity.
    Keith DA; Akçakaya HR; Murray NJ
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):322-332. PubMed ID: 28703324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conserving the abundance of nonthreatened species.
    Baker DJ; Garnett ST; O'Connor J; Ehmke G; Clarke RH; Woinarski JCZ; McGeoch MA
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 30047186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting recovery criteria for threatened and endangered plant species on the basis of past abundances and biological traits.
    Neel MC; Che-Castaldo JP
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 23293869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separating Proactive Conservation from Species Listing Decisions.
    Kovach AI; Cheeseman AE; Cohen JB; Rittenhouse CD; Whipps CM
    Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 70(5):710-729. PubMed ID: 36100759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
    Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate.
    Gregory R; Arvai J; Gerber LR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1212-21. PubMed ID: 24299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.