BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31584502)

  • 1. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.
    Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral Routing of Signal Systems Can Improve Speech Recognition and Comprehension in Dynamic Classrooms.
    Picou EM; Davis H; Lewis D; Tharpe AM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2468-2482. PubMed ID: 32574079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Griffin AM; Atri A; Licameli G; Stiles DJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):588-602. PubMed ID: 36575571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listening Effort in School-Aged Children With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally: Examining the Effects of a Personal, Digital Remote Microphone System and a Contralateral Routing of Signal System.
    Oosthuizen I; Picou EM; Pottas L; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216520984700. PubMed ID: 33602042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss.
    Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Spahr A; Rajguru S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):579-589. PubMed ID: 30541657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations for Choosing Microphone Technologies for Students With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally.
    Picou EM; Davis H; Tharpe AM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 31913805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
    Pittman AL; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition.
    Kenworthy OT; Klee T; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 1990 Aug; 11(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 2210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane.
    Pedley AJ; Kitterick PT
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():104-111. PubMed ID: 28666702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Baha® Divino™.
    Oeding K; Valente M; Kerckhoff J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):546-57. PubMed ID: 21034701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Training on the Use of a Manual Microphone Shutoff on a BiCROS Device.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau C; Crose B; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 26055837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Speech-in-Noise and Localization Benefits in Unilateral Hearing Loss Subjects Using Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids or Bone-Anchored Implants.
    Snapp HA; Holt FD; Liu X; Rajguru SM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27846038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.