These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31585817)

  • 41. Associations between volume changes and spatial dose metrics for the urinary bladder during local versus pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer.
    Casares-Magaz O; Moiseenko V; Hopper A; Pettersson NJ; Thor M; Knopp R; Deasy JO; Muren LP; Einck J
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):884-890. PubMed ID: 28401808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A multiple-image-based method to evaluate the performance of deformable image registration in the pelvis.
    Saleh Z; Thor M; Apte AP; Sharp G; Tang X; Veeraraghavan H; Muren L; Deasy J
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6172-80. PubMed ID: 27469495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of a DVH overlay technique for quality assurance of deformable image registration-based dose accumulation.
    Kainz K; Garcia Alvarez J; Zhong H; Lim S; Ahunbay E; Tai A; Erickson B; Lawton C; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):611-623. PubMed ID: 34826153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dosimetric adaptive IMRT driven by fiducial points.
    Crijns W; Van Herck H; Defraene G; Van den Bergh L; Slagmolen P; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061716. PubMed ID: 24877811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development and evaluation of a novel MR-compatible pelvic end-to-end phantom.
    Cunningham JM; Barberi EA; Miller J; Kim JP; Glide-Hurst CK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):265-275. PubMed ID: 30411477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of rectum and bladder dose accumulation from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer using two different deformable image registration techniques.
    Kadoya N; Miyasaka Y; Yamamoto T; Kuroda Y; Ito K; Chiba M; Nakajima Y; Takahashi N; Kubozono M; Umezawa R; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Jingu K
    J Radiat Res; 2017 Sep; 58(5):720-728. PubMed ID: 28595311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Daily dosimetric variation between image-guided volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy and MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Nicosia L; Sicignano G; Rigo M; Figlia V; Cuccia F; De Simone A; Giaj-Levra N; Mazzola R; Naccarato S; Ricchetti F; Vitale C; Ruggieri R; Alongi F
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 32945701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Gardner SJ; Wen N; Kim J; Liu C; Pradhan D; Aref I; Cattaneo R; Vance S; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Elshaikh MA
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4429-47. PubMed ID: 25988718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of automatic deformable structure propagation for high-field MRI guided prostate radiotherapy.
    Christiansen RL; Dysager L; Bertelsen AS; Hansen O; Brink C; Bernchou U
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 15(1):32. PubMed ID: 32033574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bladder dose accumulation based on a biomechanical deformable image registration algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.
    Andersen ES; Muren LP; Sørensen TS; Noe KO; Thor M; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen L; Tanderup K
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7089-100. PubMed ID: 23051686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy - how should we evaluate and interpret the result?
    Nie K; Pouliot J; Smith E; Chuang C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27074457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantification of dose uncertainties in cumulated dose estimation compared to planned dose in prostate IMRT.
    Nassef M; Simon A; Cazoulat G; Duménil A; Blay C; Lafond C; Acosta O; Balosso J; Haigron P; de Crevoisier R
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Apr; 119(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 26993416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. End-to-end test of an online adaptive treatment procedure in MR-guided radiotherapy using a phantom with anthropomorphic structures.
    Elter A; Dorsch S; Mann P; Runz A; Johnen W; Spindeldreier CK; Klüter S; Karger CP
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(22):225003. PubMed ID: 31610529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prostate or bone? Comparing the efficacy of image guidance surrogates for pelvis and prostate radiotherapy using accumulated delivered dose.
    Kong VC; Rosewall T; Catton C; Chung P; Warde P; Craig T; Bayley A
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Mar; 52(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 33139231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intrafractional stability of MR-guided online adaptive SBRT for prostate cancer.
    Schaule J; Chamberlain M; Wilke L; Baumgartl M; Krayenbühl J; Zamburlini M; Mayinger M; Andratschke N; Tanadini-Lang S; Guckenberger M
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Sep; 16(1):189. PubMed ID: 34565439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Regression and statistical shape model based substitute CT generation for MRI alone external beam radiation therapy from standard clinical MRI sequences.
    Ghose S; Greer PB; Sun J; Pichler P; Rivest-Henault D; Mitra J; Richardson H; Wratten C; Martin J; Arm J; Best L; Dowling JA
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(22):8566-8580. PubMed ID: 28976369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Improved dosimetric accuracy with semi-automatic contour propagation of organs-at-risk in glioblastoma patients undergoing chemoradiation.
    Lee S; Stewart J; Lee Y; Myrehaug S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M; Tseng CL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):45-53. PubMed ID: 31670900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is Dose Deformation-Invariance Hypothesis Verified in Prostate IGRT?
    Simon A; Le Maitre A; Nassef M; Rigaud B; Castelli J; Acosta O; Haigron P; Lafond C; de Crevoisier R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28244420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR.
    Takayama Y; Kadoya N; Yamamoto T; Ito K; Chiba M; Fujiwara K; Miyasaka Y; Dobashi S; Sato K; Takeda K; Jingu K
    J Radiat Res; 2017 Jul; 58(4):567-571. PubMed ID: 28158642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of the correlation between prostatic displacement and rectal deformation using the Dice similarity coefficient of the rectum.
    Tanabe Y; Ishida T; Eto H; Sera T; Emoto Y
    Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):e39-e43. PubMed ID: 30642696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.