These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31586)

  • 21. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Abenhaim HA; Morin L; Benjamin A; Kinch RA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction.
    Moolgaoker AS; Ahamed SO; Payne PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 54(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 471369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Umbilical cord blood acid-base values in uncomplicated term vaginal breech deliveries.
    Daniel Y; Fait G; Lessing JB; Jaffa A; Gull I; Shenav M; Peyser MR; Kupferminc MJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Feb; 77(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 9512324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shoulder dystocia. A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery.
    Benedetti TJ; Gabbe SG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov; 52(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 724169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction.
    Baerthlein WC; Moodley S; Stinson SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 3960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Neonatal outcomes after instrumental vaginal delivery].
    Baud O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S260-8. PubMed ID: 19268202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognosis for future childbearing after midcavity instrumental deliveries in primigravidas.
    Kadar N; Romero R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 6866358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
    Meyer L; Mailloux J; Marcoux S; Blanchet P; Meyer F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 3439447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acid-base evaluation of umbilical cord blood: relation to delivery mode and Apgar scores.
    Nickelsen C; Weber T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Mar; 24(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 3104107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Hook CD; Damos JR
    Am Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 78(8):953-60. PubMed ID: 18953972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Studies and comparisons of the degree of fetal distress after the use of the vacuum extractor and forceps].
    Cappello F
    Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1968; 73(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 5742959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prevention of cerebral palsy during labour: role of foetal lactate.
    Borruto F; Comparetto C; Treisser A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 278(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18071726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas and vacuum deliveries].
    Menard JP; Provansal M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Bretelle F; Mazouni C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 18539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.