These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31586294)

  • 1. Detection of incident breast and colorectal cancer cases from an administrative healthcare database in Catalonia, Spain.
    Escribà JM; Banqué M; Macià F; Gálvez J; Esteban L; Pareja L; Clèries R; Sanz X; Castells X; Borrás JM; Ribes J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jun; 22(6):943-952. PubMed ID: 31586294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation study of colorectal cancer diagnosis in the Spanish primary care database, BIFAP.
    Gil M; Rodríguez-Miguel A; Montoya-Catalá H; González-González R; Álvarez-Gutiérrez A; Rodríguez-Martín S; García-Rodríguez LA; de Abajo FJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 30548462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
    Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases.
    Baldi I; Vicari P; Di Cuonzo D; Zanetti R; Pagano E; Rosato R; Sacerdote C; Segnan N; Merletti F; Ciccone G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 18313562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring colorectal cancer incidence: the performance of an algorithm using administrative health data.
    Diop M; Strumpf EC; Datta GD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 29739338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cure indicators and prevalence by stage at diagnosis for breast and colorectal cancer patients: A population-based study in Italy.
    Dal Maso L; Toffolutti F; De Paoli A; Giudici F; Francisci S; Bucchi L; Zorzi M; Fusco M; Caldarella A; Rossi S; De Angelis R; Botta L; Ravaioli A; Casella C; Musolino A; Vitale MF; Mangone L; Fanetti AC; Carpin E; Burgio Lo Monaco MG; Migliore E; Gambino ML; Ferrante M; Stracci F; Gasparotti C; Carrozzi G; Cavallo R; Mazzucco W; Ballotari P; Ferretti S; Sampietro G; Rizzello RV; Boschetti L; Cascone G; Mian M; Pesce MT; Piras D; Galasso R; Bella F; Seghini P; Pinna P; Crocetti E; Serraino D; Guzzinati S;
    Int J Cancer; 2024 Jul; 155(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 38520231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer staging at diagnosis data comparisons in South Australia.
    Meng R; Venugopal K; Thomas H; D'Onise K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):1008. PubMed ID: 31974401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of administrative hospital data for identifying incident pancreatic and periampullary cancer cases: a population-based study using linked cancer registry and administrative hospital data in New South Wales, Australia.
    Creighton N; Walton R; Roder D; Aranda S; Currow D
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011161. PubMed ID: 27371553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer incidence using a French administrative database (general sample of health insurance beneficiaries).
    Doat S; Samson S; Fagot-Campagna A; Tuppin P; Menegaux F
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2016 Jun; 64(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 27238161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) as a tool for cancer epidemiological surveillance.
    Fernández-Navarro P; López-Abente G; Salido-Campos C; Sanz-Anquela JM
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 34():94-97. PubMed ID: 27499180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of right-sided colorectal cancer after breast cancer: a population-based study.
    Tang LY; Nugent Z; Demers AA; Singh H
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1213-20. PubMed ID: 19319130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of the lookback period and definition of confirmatory events on the identification of incident cancer cases in administrative data.
    Czwikla J; Jobski K; Schink T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):122. PubMed ID: 28806932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an algorithm to identify incident breast cancer cases using DRGs data.
    Ganry O; Taleb A; Peng J; Raverdy N; Dubreuil A
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 12883382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and validation of case-finding algorithms for recurrence of breast cancer using routinely collected administrative data.
    Xu Y; Kong S; Cheung WY; Bouchard-Fortier A; Dort JC; Quan H; Buie EM; McKinnon G; Quan ML
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Mar; 19(1):210. PubMed ID: 30849954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in the surgical procedures of women with incident breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain, over a 7-year period (2005-2011).
    Escribà JM; Pareja L; Esteban L; Gálvez J; Melià A; Roca L; Clèries R; Sanz X; Bustins M; Pla MJ; Gil MJ; Borrás JM; Ribes J
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Sep; 7():587. PubMed ID: 25178360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Evaluation of Algorithms for Identifying Metastatic Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer in Administrative Claims Data.
    Whyte JL; Engel-Nitz NM; Teitelbaum A; Gomez Rey G; Kallich JD
    Med Care; 2015 Jul; 53(7):e49-57. PubMed ID: 23524464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal cancer ascertainment through cancer registries, hospital episode statistics, and self-reporting compared to confirmation by clinician: A cohort study nested within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).
    Thomas DS; Gentry-Maharaj A; Ryan A; Fourkala EO; Apostolidou S; Burnell M; Alderton W; Barnes J; Timms JF; Menon U
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 58():167-174. PubMed ID: 30616086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and completeness of colorectal cancer diagnoses in a primary care database in the United Kingdom.
    Cea Soriano L; Soriano-Gabarró M; García Rodríguez LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 26436320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Validation of colorectal cancer diagnostic codes in a hospital administration data set].
    Márquez Cid M; Valera Niñirola I; Chirlaque López MD; Tortosa Martínez J; Párraga Sánchez E; Navarro Sánchez C
    Gac Sanit; 2006; 20(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 16942712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence of advanced colorectal cancer in Germany: comparing claims data and cancer registry data.
    Oppelt KA; Luttmann S; Kraywinkel K; Haug U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31286896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.