These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31586412)

  • 1. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Paduano S; Rongo R; Bucci R; Carvelli G; Cioffi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 31586412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived facial changes of Class II Division 1 patients with convex profiles after functional orthopedic treatment followed by fixed orthodontic appliances.
    Tsiouli K; Topouzelis N; Papadopoulos MA; Gkantidis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jul; 152(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 28651771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial attractiveness of skeletal Class II patients before and after mandibular advancement surgery as perceived by people with different backgrounds.
    Ng D; De Silva RK; Smit R; De Silva H; Farella M
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 22573907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.
    Zouloumi ME; Tsiouli K; Psomiadis S; Kolokitha OE; Topouzelis N; Gkantidis N
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Nov; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31761963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A non-cephalometric two-dimensional appraisal of soft tissue changes by functional therapy in Class II patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Luyten J; Vierendeel M; De Roo NMC; Temmerman L; De Pauw GAM
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Sep; 44(5):503-512. PubMed ID: 35064669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile.
    O'Brien K; Macfarlane T; Wright J; Conboy F; Appelbe P; Birnie D; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; Littlewood S; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Sandler J; Read M; Robinson S; Shaw I; Turbill E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 19409340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment.
    Rocha AD; Casteluci CEVF; Ferreira FPC; Conti AC; Almeida MR; Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 34():e003. PubMed ID: 32022222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term profile attractiveness of patients with Class I and II malocclusion treated with and without extractions: A 35-year follow-up.
    Bravo Vallejo G; Alcaraz Ros GD; Peloso RM; Gambardela-Tkacz CM; Cotrin P; Freitas KMS; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 May; 165(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 38231168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Rego MV; Martinez EF; Coelho RM; Leal LM; Thiesen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):559-564. PubMed ID: 28257740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.
    von Bremen J; Erbe C; Pancherz H; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 May; 75(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 24825829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion.
    Koniarova Z; Husarova R; Stefkova M; Spidlen M; Statelova D; Janickova M; Koniarova A
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2022; 123(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 35343750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Study of chin morphology in Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion after non-extraction orthodontic treatment].
    Fan FY; Wang XX; Zhang J
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 22241321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople.
    Santori F; Masedu F; Ciavarella D; Staderini E; Chimenti C; Tepedino M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13989. PubMed ID: 34234201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue changes: a comparison between changes caused by the construction bite and by successful treatment with a modified Twin-block appliance.
    Salloum E; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):512-518. PubMed ID: 29300850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do the Most Attractive Faces of Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Differ From Those With the Least Attractive Faces in Terms of Angular and Proportional Measurements Assessed on Frontal and Lateral Photographs?
    Mortada AA; Burhan AS; Hajeer MY; Nawaya FR; Sahtout GF
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33455. PubMed ID: 36628400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attractiveness of the facial profile: comparison of Class II patients treated with Twin Force® or intermaxillary elastics.
    Pozza OA; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; Freitas KMS; Oliveira RC; Oliveira RCG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(5):e212014. PubMed ID: 34669827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.