430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31587128)
1. Challenges of recognizing bicuspid aortic valve in elderly patients undergoing TAVR.
Kim WK; Liebetrau C; Fischer-Rasokat U; Renker M; Rolf A; Doss M; Möllmann H; Nef H; Walther T; Hamm CW
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):251-256. PubMed ID: 31587128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Bicuspid Aortic Valve Imaging Classification for the TAVR Era.
Jilaihawi H; Chen M; Webb J; Himbert D; Ruiz CE; Rodés-Cabau J; Pache G; Colombo A; Nickenig G; Lee M; Tamburino C; Sievert H; Abramowitz Y; Tarantini G; Alqoofi F; Chakravarty T; Kashif M; Takahashi N; Kazuno Y; Maeno Y; Kawamori H; Chieffo A; Blanke P; Dvir D; Ribeiro HB; Feng Y; Zhao ZG; Sinning JM; Kliger C; Giustino G; Pajerski B; Imme S; Grube E; Leipsic J; Vahanian A; Michev I; Jelnin V; Latib A; Cheng W; Makkar R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1145-1158. PubMed ID: 27372022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bicuspid Aortic Valve: What to Image in Patients Considered for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?
Kong WKF; Delgado V; Bax JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28877885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies.
Philip F; Faza NN; Schoenhagen P; Desai MY; Tuzcu EM; Svensson LG; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):E88-98. PubMed ID: 25914355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of multislice computed tomography findings between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Watanabe Y; Chevalier B; Hayashida K; Leong T; Bouvier E; Arai T; Farge A; Hovasse T; Garot P; Cormier B; Morice MC; Lefèvre T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 25594190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis.
Arai T; Lefèvre T; Hovasse T; Morice MC; Romano M; Benamer H; Garot P; Hayashida K; Bouvier E; Chevalier B
J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 70(3):220-224. PubMed ID: 28209261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in bicuspid compared to trileaflet aortic valves.
Nagaraja V; Suh W; Fischman DL; Banning A; Martinez SC; Potts J; Kwok CS; Ratib K; Nolan J; Bagur R; Mamas MA
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jan; 20(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 30287215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.
Jin Q; Chen S; Yang X; Li M; Li W; Zhang X; Zhou D; Lam YY; Ge J
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Dec; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36503424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Annular versus supra-annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
Weir-McCall JR; Attinger-Toller A; Blanke P; Perlman GY; Sellers SL; Wood D; Webb JG; Leipsic J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(5):407-413. PubMed ID: 32029384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry.
Tchetche D; de Biase C; van Gils L; Parma R; Ochala A; Lefevre T; Hovasse T; De Backer O; Sondergaard L; Bleiziffer S; Lange R; Kornowski R; Landes U; Norgaard BL; Biasco L; Philippart R; Molina-Martin de Nicolas J; Mylotte D; Lemee C; Dumonteil N; Van Mieghem NM
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007107. PubMed ID: 30626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography in candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Maia J; Ladeiras-Lopes R; Guerreiro C; Carvalho M; Fontes-Carvalho R; Braga P; Sampaio F
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 36(2):291-298. PubMed ID: 31659601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and hemodynamic results after direct transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus pre-implantation balloon aortic valvuloplasty: A case-matched analysis.
Ferrera C; Nombela-Franco L; Garcia E; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Biagioni C; Gonzalo N; Nuñez-Gil I; Viana-Tejedor A; Salinas P; Alberto de Agustin J; Almeria C; Islas F; Perez de Isla L; Fernandez-Perez C; Escaned J; Fernández-Ortiz A; Macaya C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):809-816. PubMed ID: 27515377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal pre-TAVR annulus sizing in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: area-derived perimeter by CT is the best-correlated measure with intraoperative sizing.
Wang Y; Wang M; Song G; Wang W; Lv B; Wang H; Wu Y
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):259-269. PubMed ID: 29926206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of one- and 12-month outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severely stenotic bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (results from a multicenter registry).
Kochman J; Huczek Z; Scisło P; Dabrowski M; Chmielak Z; Szymański P; Witkowski A; Parma R; Ochala A; Chodór P; Wilczek K; Reczuch KW; Kubler P; Rymuza B; Kołtowski L; Scibisz A; Wilimski R; Grube E; Opolski G
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 114(5):757-62. PubMed ID: 25037674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in metabolic profiles between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Xiong TY; Liu C; Liao YB; Zheng W; Li YJ; Li X; Ou Y; Wang ZJ; Wang X; Li CM; Zhao ZG; Feng Y; Liu XJ; Chen M
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 May; 20(1):229. PubMed ID: 32423380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes and the impact of valve morphology for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gupta R; Mahmoudi E; Behnoush AH; Malik AH; Mahajan P; Lin M; Bandyopadhyay D; Goel A; Chakraborty S; Aedma SK; Gupta HB; Vyas AV; Combs WG; Mathur M; Yakubov SJ; Patel NC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 102(4):721-730. PubMed ID: 37605512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of age and aortic valve anatomy on calcification and haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis.
Shen M; Tastet L; Capoulade R; Larose É; Bédard É; Arsenault M; Chetaille P; Dumesnil JG; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27504001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bicuspid aortic valve sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Development and validation of an algorithm based on multi-slice computed tomography.
Petronio AS; Angelillis M; De Backer O; Giannini C; Costa G; Fiorina C; Castriota F; Bedogni F; Laborde JC; Søndergaard L
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(5):452-461. PubMed ID: 32001214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography predictors of mortality, stroke and conduction disturbances in women undergoing TAVR: A sub-analysis of the WIN-TAVI registry.
Spaziano M; Chieffo A; Watanabe Y; Chandrasekhar J; Sartori S; Lefèvre T; Petronio AS; Presbitero P; Tchetche D; Iadanza A; Van Mieghem NM; Mehilli J; Mehran R; Morice MC;
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):338-343. PubMed ID: 29735255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
