These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31588377)

  • 1. The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections.
    Bowers AR; Bronstad PM; Spano LP; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 8(5):14. PubMed ID: 31588377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.
    Bowers AR; Ananyev E; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1540-8. PubMed ID: 24474265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of age on the contributions of head and eye movements to scanning behavior at intersections.
    Savage SW; Zhang L; Swan G; Bowers AR
    Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2020 Aug; 73():128-142. PubMed ID: 32742187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head Scanning Behavior Predicts Hazard Detection Safety Before Entering an Intersection.
    Savage SW; Zhang L; Swan G; Bowers AR
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):942-955. PubMed ID: 34435529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driving With Hemianopia VII: Predicting Hazard Detection With Gaze and Head Scan Magnitude.
    Swan G; Savage SW; Zhang L; Bowers AR
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):20. PubMed ID: 33510959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.
    Xu J; Baliutaviciute V; Swan G; Bowers AR
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():938140. PubMed ID: 35898933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. THE EFFECTS OF GUIDANCE METHOD ON DETECTION AND SCANNING AT INTERSECTIONS - A PILOT STUDY.
    Savage SW; Zhang L; Pepo D; Sheldon SS; Spano LP; Bowers AR
    Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des; 2017 Jun; 2017():340-346. PubMed ID: 29399674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of an In-vehicle Collision Warning System on Older Drivers' On-road Head Movements at Intersections.
    Shichrur R; Ratzon NZ; Shoham A; Borowsky A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():596278. PubMed ID: 33679517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory Reminder Cues to Promote Proactive Scanning on Approach to Intersections in Drivers With Homonymous Hemianopia: Driving With Hemianopia, IX.
    Xu J; Emmermann B; Bowers AR
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 140(1):75-78. PubMed ID: 34817569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
    Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47. PubMed ID: 19608541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the Glance Patterns of Older versus Younger Experienced Drivers: Scanning for Hazards while Approaching and Entering the Intersection.
    Romoser MR; Pollatsek A; Fisher DL; Williams CC
    Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2013 Jan; 16():104-116. PubMed ID: 23148130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?
    Alberti CF; Goldstein RB; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):11. PubMed ID: 29067219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.
    Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
    Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual Field Dependence Persists in Age-Related Central Visual Field Loss.
    Agathos CP; Shanidze NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2024 Feb; 65(2):22. PubMed ID: 38345555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-Related Differences in Vehicle Control and Eye Movement Patterns at Intersections: Older and Middle-Aged Drivers.
    Yamani Y; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Fisher DL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164124. PubMed ID: 27736887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drivers' visual scanning behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic driving study in China.
    Li G; Wang Y; Zhu F; Sui X; Wang N; Qu X; Green P
    J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():219-229. PubMed ID: 31862033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does the extent of central visual field loss affect adaptive gait?
    Timmis MA; Scarfe AC; Pardhan S
    Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():55-60. PubMed ID: 27004633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.