BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31588544)

  • 1. Prognostic role of PET/CT in endometrial cancer.
    Yanarateş A; Budak E
    Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(9):491-495. PubMed ID: 31588544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma.
    Liu DD; Li J; Li X; Xie L; Qin L; Peng F; Cheng MH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(6):e89. PubMed ID: 31576685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective analysis of the
    Yang Y; Pan YQ; Wang M; Gu S; Bao W
    Radiat Oncol; 2023 Dec; 18(1):196. PubMed ID: 38049843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PET Parameters are Useful in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Risk Classes and Prognosis.
    Budak A; Beyan E; Inan AH; Kanmaz AG; Aldemir OS; Oral A; Yazici B; Akgün A; Ozeren M
    Nuklearmedizin; 2021 Feb; 60(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 33105511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Preoperative Identification of High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma Patients.
    Husby JA; Reitan BC; Biermann M; Trovik J; Bjørge L; Magnussen IJ; Salvesen ØO; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 26045311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
    Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic role of FDG PET-derived parameters in preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.
    Mapelli P; Bergamini A; Fallanca F; Rancoita PMV; Cioffi R; Incerti E; Rabaiotti E; Petrone M; Mangili G; Candiani M; Gianolli L; Picchio M
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 30573387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in salivary gland carcinomas.
    Ryu IS; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23670902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
    Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pretreatment quantitative
    Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic role of baseline
    Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
    Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prognostic role of PET/CT in small-cell lung cancer.
    Budak E; Yanarateş A; Akgün A
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 31865009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Evaluation of Preoperative
    Vural Topuz Ö; Aksu A; Erinç SR; Tokgözoğlu N; Tamam MÖ
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2022 Feb; 31(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 35114747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of metabolic parameters of primary lesions examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT for endometrial cancer in preoperative evaluation.
    Gai QZ; Lv YB; Li GY; Zhang DQ; Gao Z; Fang XH
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Mar; 25(6):2493-2502. PubMed ID: 33829435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
    Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, measured using preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, predict the recurrence of endometrial cancer.
    Shim SH; Kim DY; Lee DY; Lee SW; Park JY; Lee JJ; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1097-106; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 24397772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and correlation with PET-CT metabolic parameters in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
    Mirili C; Guney IB; Paydas S; Seydaoglu G; Kapukaya TK; Ogul A; Gokcay S; Buyuksimsek M; Yetisir AE; Karaalioglu B; Tohumcuoglu M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 24(2):168-178. PubMed ID: 30109543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
    Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tailoring systematic lymphadenectomy in high-risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Crivellaro C; Signorelli M; Guerra L; De Ponti E; Pirovano C; Fruscio R; Elisei F; Montanelli L; Buda A; Messa C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 130(2):306-11. PubMed ID: 23707673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative risk stratification using metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Maeda T; Ebina Y; Yamada H; Okunaga T; Kubo K; Sofue K; Kanda T; Tamaki Y; Sugimura K
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(8):1268-75. PubMed ID: 25833351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.