291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31589083)
1. Detailed subject-specific FE rib modeling for fracture prediction.
Iraeus J; Lundin L; Storm S; Agnew A; Kang YS; Kemper A; Albert D; Holcombe S; Pipkorn B
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S88-S95. PubMed ID: 31589083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Subject-specific rib finite element models with material data derived from coupon tests under bending loading.
Yates KM; Agnew AM; Albert DL; Kemper AR; Untaroiu CD
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 116():104358. PubMed ID: 33610029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction.
Li Z; Kindig MW; Subit D; Kent RW
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Nov; 32(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 20674456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rib fractures under anterior-posterior dynamic loads: experimental and finite-element study.
Li Z; Kindig MW; Kerrigan JR; Untaroiu CD; Subit D; Crandall JR; Kent RW
J Biomech; 2010 Jan; 43(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 19875122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing FE human body model rib geometry to population data.
Holcombe SA; Agnew AM; Derstine B; Wang SC
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2227-2239. PubMed ID: 32444978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element models of rib as an inhomogeneous beam structure under high-speed impacts.
Niu Y; Shen W; Stuhmiller JH
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):788-98. PubMed ID: 17045511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Generic finite element models of human ribs, developed and validated for stiffness and strain prediction - To be used in rib fracture risk evaluation for the human population in vehicle crashes.
Iraeus J; Brolin K; Pipkorn B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jun; 106():103742. PubMed ID: 32250953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of rib structural responses under dynamic loadings using different material properties: A finite element analysis.
Shen J; Roth S
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Jul; 105():103820. PubMed ID: 35781384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the numerical response and fracture location of the GHBMC M50 rib in dynamic anterior-posterior loading.
Rampersadh C; Agnew AM; Malcolm S; Gierczycka D; Iraeus J; Cronin D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105527. PubMed ID: 36306670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Contribution of Pre-impact Posture on Restrained Occupant Finite Element Model Response in Frontal Impact.
Poulard D; Subit D; Nie B; Donlon JP; Kent RW
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S87-95. PubMed ID: 26436247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of asymmetry and anisotropy in predicting cortical bone response and fracture using human body model femur in three-point bending and axial rotation.
Khor F; Cronin DS; Watson B; Gierczycka D; Malcolm S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():213-229. PubMed ID: 30081355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress profile of infant rib in the setting of child abuse: A finite element parametric study.
Tsai A; Coats B; Kleinman PK
J Biomech; 2012 Jul; 45(11):1861-8. PubMed ID: 22727522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Failed rib region prediction in a human body model during crash events with precrash braking.
Guleyupoglu B; Koya B; Barnard R; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S37-S43. PubMed ID: 29584477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel ex vivo model of compressive immature rib fractures at pathophysiological rates of loading.
Beadle N; Burnett TL; Hoyland JA; Sherratt MJ; Freemont AJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Nov; 51():154-62. PubMed ID: 26253206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross-sectional geometry.
Holcombe SA; Kang YS; Derstine BA; Wang SC; Agnew AM
J Anat; 2019 Nov; 235(5):883-891. PubMed ID: 31225915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population trends in human rib cross-sectional shapes.
Holcombe SA; Huang Y; Derstine BA
J Anat; 2024 May; 244(5):792-802. PubMed ID: 38200705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rib Geometry Explains Variation in Dynamic Structural Response: Potential Implications for Frontal Impact Fracture Risk.
Murach MM; Kang YS; Goldman SD; Schafman MA; Schlecht SH; Moorhouse K; Bolte JH; Agnew AM
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 45(9):2159-2173. PubMed ID: 28547660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mode of failure of rib fixation with absorbable plates: a clinical and numerical modeling study.
Marasco SF; Sutalo ID; Bui AV
J Trauma; 2010 May; 68(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 20453773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical response of ribs under quasistatic frontal loading.
Kindig M; Lau AG; Kent RW
Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):377-87. PubMed ID: 21823946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-sectional properties of rib geometry from an adult population.
Holcombe S; Huang Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1158242. PubMed ID: 37284235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
