These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31589951)

  • 1. More comprehensive reporting of methods in studies using respondent driven sampling is required: a systematic review of the uptake of the STROBE-RDS guidelines.
    Avery L; Rotondi M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():68-77. PubMed ID: 31589951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: "STROBE-RDS" statement.
    White RG; Hakim AJ; Salganik MJ; Spiller MW; Johnston LG; Kerr L; Kendall C; Drake A; Wilson D; Orroth K; Egger M; Hladik W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1463-71. PubMed ID: 26112433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hepatitis C bio-behavioural surveys in people who inject drugs-a systematic review of sensitivity to the theoretical assumptions of respondent driven sampling.
    Buchanan R; Khakoo SI; Coad J; Grellier L; Parkes J
    Harm Reduct J; 2017 Jul; 14(1):44. PubMed ID: 28697760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does size really matter? A sensitivity analysis of number of seeds in a respondent-driven sampling study of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Vancouver, Canada.
    Lachowsky NJ; Sorge JT; Raymond HF; Cui Z; Sereda P; Rich A; Roth EA; Hogg RS; Moore DM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):157. PubMed ID: 27852234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accumulation of Biological and Behavioral Data of Female Sex Workers Using Respondent-Driven Sampling: Protocol for a Systematic Review.
    Bhatta M; Majumdar A; Banerjee S; Ghosh P; Biswas S; Dutta S
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2023 Jun; 12():e43722. PubMed ID: 37335607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lessons learned from respondent-driven sampling recruitment in Nairobi: experiences from the field.
    Okal J; Raymond HF; Tun W; Musyoki H; Dadabhai S; Broz D; Nyamu J; Kuria D; Muraguri N; Geibel S
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Mar; 9():158. PubMed ID: 26969505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using large-scale respondent driven sampling to monitor the end of an HIV epidemic among persons who inject drugs in Hai Phong, Viet Nam.
    Des Jarlais DC; Arasteh K; Huong DT; Oanh KTH; Feelemyer JP; Khue PM; Giang HT; Thanh NTT; Vinh VH; Le SM; Vallo R; Quillet C; Rapoud D; Michel L; Laureillard D; Moles JP; Nagot N;
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259983. PubMed ID: 34793523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High variability of HIV and HCV seroprevalence and risk behaviours among people who inject drugs: results from a cross-sectional study using respondent-driven sampling in eight German cities (2011-14).
    Wenz B; Nielsen S; Gassowski M; Santos-Hövener C; Cai W; Ross RS; Bock CT; Ratsch BA; Kücherer C; Bannert N; Bremer V; Hamouda O; Marcus U; Zimmermann R;
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Sep; 16(1):927. PubMed ID: 27595567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of respondent driven sampling for recruiting males who have sex with males in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    Johnston LG; Khanam R; Reza M; Khan SI; Banu S; Alam MS; Rahman M; Azim T
    AIDS Behav; 2008 Mar; 12(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 17712620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) in Repeat Surveys of Men Who have Sex with Men, Unguja, Zanzibar.
    Khatib A; Haji S; Khamis M; Said C; Khalid F; Dahoma M; Ali A; Othman A; Welty S; McFarland W
    AIDS Behav; 2017 Jul; 21(7):2180-2187. PubMed ID: 27990581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recruiting injection drug users: a three-site comparison of results and experiences with respondent-driven and targeted sampling procedures.
    Robinson WT; Risser JM; McGoy S; Becker AB; Rehman H; Jefferson M; Griffin V; Wolverton M; Tortu S
    J Urban Health; 2006 Nov; 83(6 Suppl):i29-38. PubMed ID: 16933101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling data.
    Handcock MS; Gile KJ; Mar CM
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):258-266. PubMed ID: 25585794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical design and analysis plan for an impact evaluation of an HIV treatment and prevention intervention for female sex workers in Zimbabwe: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Hargreaves JR; Fearon E; Davey C; Phillips A; Cambiano V; Cowan FM
    Trials; 2016 Jan; 17():6. PubMed ID: 26728882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respondent driven sampling for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance in Latin America and the Caribbean.
    Montealegre JR; Johnston LG; Murrill C; Monterroso E
    AIDS Behav; 2013 Sep; 17(7):2313-40. PubMed ID: 23568227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Systematic Review of Published Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys Collecting Behavioral and Biologic Data.
    Johnston LG; Hakim AJ; Dittrich S; Burnett J; Kim E; White RG
    AIDS Behav; 2016 Aug; 20(8):1754-76. PubMed ID: 26992395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling.
    McCreesh N; Frost SD; Seeley J; Katongole J; Tarsh MN; Ndunguse R; Jichi F; Lunel NL; Maher D; Johnston LG; Sonnenberg P; Copas AJ; Hayes RJ; White RG
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 22157309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods to recruit hard-to-reach groups: comparing two chain referral sampling methods of recruiting injecting drug users across nine studies in Russia and Estonia.
    Platt L; Wall M; Rhodes T; Judd A; Hickman M; Johnston LG; Renton A; Bobrova N; Sarang A
    J Urban Health; 2006 Nov; 83(6 Suppl):i39-53. PubMed ID: 17096189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters.
    Serrano M; Gonzalvo MC; Sánchez-Pozo MC; Clavero A; Fernández MF; López-Regalado ML; Mozas J; Martínez L; Castilla JA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1122-33. PubMed ID: 24781429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing reliability of naïve respondent-driven sampling samples by using repeated surveys among people who inject drugs (PWID) in New Jersey.
    Wang P; Wogayehu A; Bolden B; Ibrahim AR; Raymond HF
    Ann Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 94():100-105. PubMed ID: 38719178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 12 city HIV Surveillance Survey among MSM in Brazil 2016 using respondent-driven sampling: a description of methods and RDS diagnostics.
    Kendall C; Kerr L; Mota RS; Guimarães MDC; Leal AF; Merchan-Hamann E; Dourado IC; Veras MA; Brito AM; Pontes AK; Castro ARCM; Macena RHM; Knauth D; Linda LC; Oliveira LC; Cavalcante S; Camillo AC; Bermudez XPD; Moreira RC; Benzaken AS; Pereira G; Pascom ARP; Pimenta C; Grazina Johnston L
    Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 22():e190004. PubMed ID: 30892467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.