These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31589953)

  • 1. More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date.
    Rombey T; Doni K; Hoffmann F; Pieper D; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():60-67. PubMed ID: 31589953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 7(1):32. PubMed ID: 29463298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.
    Runjic E; Rombey T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():114-121. PubMed ID: 31476376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics, completion and publication of PROSPERO records in regional anesthesia for acute perioperative pain.
    Carev M; Čivljak M; Puljak L; Došenović S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2023 Mar; 12(3):e220129. PubMed ID: 36688587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO.
    Khaleel S; Cleveland B; Kalapara A; Sathianathen N; Balaji P; Dahm P
    World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2981-2986. PubMed ID: 31784773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.
    Allers K; Hoffmann F; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 29258907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality.
    Sideri S; Papageorgiou SN; Eliades T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():103-110. PubMed ID: 29339215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of registered and published systematic reviews focusing on the prevention of COVID-19: a meta-research study.
    Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Siemens W; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
    BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e060255. PubMed ID: 35534064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
    Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence.
    Hoffmann F; Eggers D; Pieper D; Zeeb H; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():92-99. PubMed ID: 31809847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO.
    Hu K; Zhao L; Zhou Q; Mei F; Gao Q; Chen F; Jiang M; Zhao B; Zhang W; Kwong JSW; Ma Y; Mou C; Ma B
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 33522101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto H; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):703. PubMed ID: 29208054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of international collaborative research efforts to develop non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Viguera-Guerra I; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Montilla A; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Gómez-Arias PJ; Vélez García-Nieto A; Gómez-Garcia F; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211919. PubMed ID: 30811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study.
    Siemens W; Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():36-46. PubMed ID: 36179937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.
    Biocic M; Fidahic M; Cikes K; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 31393677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasons and factors associated with inconclusiveness of systematic reviews about interventions for neuropathic pain.
    Dosenovic S; Dujmic A; Nujic D; Vuka I; Tintor G; Kadic AJ; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Jan; 10(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 33355481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.