179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31589998)
1. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
Soto-Álvarez C; Fonseca GM; Viciano J; Alemán I; Rojas-Torres J; Zúñiga MH; López-Lázaro S
Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Initial establishment of digital reference standardized crown models of the primary teeth].
Feng SW; Guo H; Wang Y; Zhao YJ; Liu H
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Apr; 54(2):327-334. PubMed ID: 35435200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-arch digital model vs. manual cast measurements: Accuracy and reliability.
Kiviahde H; Bukovac L; Jussila P; Pesonen P; Sipilä K; Raustia A; Pirttiniemi P
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):222-227. PubMed ID: 28659050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of the morphological data of primary teeth in northwest China.
Lu XX; Yang K; Zhang BZ; Wang JH; Du Y; Chen YJ; Wang XJ
Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():1010423. PubMed ID: 36533246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental long axes using digital dental models compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
Cong A; Massaro C; Ruellas ACO; Barkley M; Yatabe M; Bianchi J; Ioshida M; Alvarez MA; Aristizabal JF; Rey D; Cevidanes L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 33966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crown diameters of the deciduous teeth of Taiwanese.
Liu HH; Dung SZ; Yang YH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2000 Jun; 16(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 11584431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of die trim morphology made by CAD-CAM technology.
Agrawal P; Thompson G; Cho SH; Ziebert GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):406-412. PubMed ID: 28222879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applicability of 3D-dental reconstruction in cervical odontometrics.
Kazzazi SM; Kranioti EF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Feb; 165(2):370-377. PubMed ID: 29115677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
