BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31590231)

  • 1. Elastic Mechanical Properties of 45S5-Based Bioactive Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds.
    Baino F; Fiume E
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Oct; 12(19):. PubMed ID: 31590231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of composition, structure and mechanical strength of bioactive 3-D glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone substitution.
    Baino F; Ferraris M; Bretcanu O; Verné E; Vitale-Brovarone C
    J Biomater Appl; 2013 Mar; 27(7):872-90. PubMed ID: 22207602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures.
    Ali D; Sen S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():262-270. PubMed ID: 28759838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair.
    Liu X; Rahaman MN; Hilmas GE; Bal BS
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Jun; 9(6):7025-34. PubMed ID: 23438862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive Strength Enhancement of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced 13-93B1 Bioactive Glass Scaffolds.
    Dixit K; Sinha N
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2019 May; 19(5):2738-2746. PubMed ID: 30501774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of Dynamic Elastic Modulus and Poisson's Ratio of Chemically Strengthened Glass.
    Ryou SY; Lee CS; Cho IS; Amanov A
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 33321944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of mechanical property and bioactivity of nano-bioglass 45S5 scaffold coated with poly-3-hydroxybutyrate.
    Montazeri M; Karbasi S; Foroughi MR; Monshi A; Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi R
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Feb; 26(2):62. PubMed ID: 25631260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone cell response to additively manufactured 3D micro-architectures with controlled Poisson's ratio: Auxetic vs. non-auxetic meta-biomaterials.
    Yarali E; Klimopoulou M; David K; Boukany PE; Staufer U; Fratila-Apachitei LE; Zadpoor AA; Accardo A; Mirzaali MJ
    Acta Biomater; 2024 Mar; 177():228-242. PubMed ID: 38325707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength enhancement and modulus modulation in auxetic meta-biomaterials produced by selective laser melting.
    Chen D; Li D; Pan K; Gao S; Wang B; Sun M; Zhao C; Liu X; Li N
    Acta Biomater; 2022 Nov; 153():596-613. PubMed ID: 36162764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophoretic deposition of mesoporous bioactive glass on glass-ceramic foam scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Fiorilli S; Baino F; Cauda V; Crepaldi M; Vitale-Brovarone C; Demarchi D; Onida B
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5346. PubMed ID: 25578700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical porosity in additively manufactured bioengineering scaffolds: Fabrication & characterisation.
    Shalchy F; Lovell C; Bhaskar A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103968. PubMed ID: 32745973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fabrication of hierarchically porous silk fibroin-bioactive glass composite scaffold via indirect 3D printing: Effect of particle size on physico-mechanical properties and in vitro cellular behavior.
    Bidgoli MR; Alemzadeh I; Tamjid E; Khafaji M; Vossoughi M
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Oct; 103():109688. PubMed ID: 31349405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro-CT based finite element models for elastic properties of glass-ceramic scaffolds.
    Tagliabue S; Rossi E; Baino F; Vitale-Brovarone C; Gastaldi D; Vena P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():248-255. PubMed ID: 27592293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured cobalt-chromium-molybdenum auxetic meta-biomaterial bone scaffolds.
    Wanniarachchi CT; Arjunan A; Baroutaji A; Singh M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Oct; 134():105409. PubMed ID: 36037704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioactive glass-reinforced bioceramic ink writing scaffolds: sintering, microstructure and mechanical behavior.
    Shao H; Yang X; He Y; Fu J; Liu L; Ma L; Zhang L; Yang G; Gao C; Gou Z
    Biofabrication; 2015 Sep; 7(3):035010. PubMed ID: 26355654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite whisker reinforced polyetherketoneketone composite scaffolds.
    Converse GL; Conrad TL; Roeder RK
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Dec; 2(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 19716108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparation and characterization of gelatin-bioactive glass ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Thomas A; Bera J
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2019 May; 30(7):561-579. PubMed ID: 30801229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing and strengthening of 58S bioactive glass-infiltrated titania scaffolds.
    Mesquita-Guimarães J; Leite MA; Souza JC; Henriques B; Silva FS; Hotza D; Boccaccini AR; Fredel MC
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Feb; 105(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 27750402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fabrication and in vitro characterization of bioactive glass composite scaffolds for bone regeneration.
    Poh PS; Hutmacher DW; Stevens MM; Woodruff MA
    Biofabrication; 2013 Dec; 5(4):045005. PubMed ID: 24192136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porous 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds using stereolithography: Effect of partial pre-sintering on structural and mechanical properties of scaffolds.
    Thavornyutikarn B; Tesavibul P; Sitthiseripratip K; Chatarapanich N; Feltis B; Wright PFA; Turney TW
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Jun; 75():1281-1288. PubMed ID: 28415417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.